On 9/26/13 5:50 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 26/09/13 03:48, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 9/25/13 11:04 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 25/09/13 16:56, Julian Elischer wrote:
If CPUs are mapped around, how are IPIs handled? I assume they must be
emulated?
I've noticed that under Xen (on both Amaz
On 27/09/13 09:44, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 9/26/13 5:50 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On 26/09/13 03:48, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>> On 9/25/13 11:04 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 25/09/13 16:56, Julian Elischer wrote:
> If CPUs are mapped around, how are IPIs handled? I assume they mus
On 27/09/13 08:16, Shanker Balan wrote:
> Helo,
>
> Now that XENHVM has been merged into the GENERIC kernel, I recompiled todays
> -CURRENT (rev 255904)
> and hit the following panic. It seeems to be HyperV related.
>
> GENERIC without "device hyperv" works properly. The hypervisor is XenServer
(Doing a proper reply all now)
On 27-Sep-2013, at 8:34 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 27/09/13 16:59, Shanker Balan wrote:
>> Roger,
>>
>> Thank you very much for looking into the issue.
>>
>> Can I have a SVN version of the patch? "patch" does not seem to like
>> the diff (or maybe I am usin
This was indeed the problem!
Solved now.
Btw, I guesss FreeBSD is the only guest type supported so far, are there
plans for linux/windows? Whats the best place to get updates on this?
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Miguel Clara wrote:
> I was actually just thinking about that... make buildwor
