) please do so and report back to me (privately) in case
of success or panics.
There is more to come.
https://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20160222-01-projects-vnets.diff
Thanks,
Bjoern
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org
Hi,
has anyone else experienced VNET jails to not fully go away anymore on a recent
HEAD kernel (or possibly an older kernel)?
I have test cases with which I can have them in DYING state (see jls -av) for
ever or at least more than half a day. I am in the process of trying to find
the cause
After reboot...
ifconfig ix1 up
dhclient ix1
DHCPDISCOVER on ix1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
DHCPOFFER from 192.168.1.1
DHCPREQUEST on ix1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 192.168.1.1
bound to 192.168.1.145 -- renewal in 21600 seconds.
ix0 down
ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1
Did you do an ifconfig up on ix1 before loading the VF driver?
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM Ultima wrote:
> Decided to do some testing with iovctl to see how sr-iov is coming along.
> Currently when adding the vf's there are a couple errors, and the network
> no longer function after iovctl
Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ultima
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:02 PM
To: Eric Joyner
Cc: freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org; freebsd-v
This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pieper, Jeffrey E <
jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have?
>
> Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:
> owner-
Yeah, dmesg does show 48. 12 Cores and 24 threads each. 48 total
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> isn't that 48 cores (12 real 12 virtual) per CPU?
>
>
> On 22/02/2016 21:26, Ultima wrote:
>
>> This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
>>
>> Ultima
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 201
I don't really have any ideas on the error -100. Error -100 means there was
a mailbox error, so something failed in the initial communications setup
between the PF and VF, but I don't know what exactly went wrong.
I'm grasping at straws, but try using a smaller number of VFs initially,
like 2? And
I forgot to mention my kernel conf I'm not sure if it would cause this
issue, but I'll test again with GENERIC.
--- /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC 2016-02-22 21:05:37.152953000 -0500
+++ /root/MYKERNEL-11-CURRENT-AMD64 2015-12-28 19:18:22.893391452 -0500
@@ -91,6 +91,12 @@
options WITNESS_SK
