Hi,
On 01/21/2017 09:13, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I'd like anyone possible to test an updated version of
>> emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11}. I have the patch here for those who
>> wish to build themselves:
>>
>> https://people.freebsd.org/~swills/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools-10.1.0.diff
>
> I tried to built it on
>
> 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r307013:311651M
>
> (why does it say r307013:311651M, btw?)Because some of your source is r307013 and other parts of your src tree has been updated to r31165. The M stands for "modified", which can mean you have local patches, but in this case may just mean the whole tree isn't at the same rev. I'm not completely sure at the moment. > > and it failed to build with: > > utilBacktrace.c:155:20: error: implicit declaration of function > '_Unwind_GetCFA' > is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > uintptr_t cfa = _Unwind_GetCFA(ctx); > ^ > utilBacktrace.c:357:4: error: implicit declaration of function > '_Unwind_Backtrace' is invalid in C99 > [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > _Unwind_Backtrace(UtilBacktraceFromPointerCallback, &data); > ^ > utilBacktrace.c:357:4: note: did you mean 'Util_Backtrace'? > > Any ideas ? > No, that's odd. I built on r311854 and had no issue. Maybe you could see if you see the same? Steve
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
