Re: IPv6 Problem with Bhyve

On 11 Sep 2020, at 13:36, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 01.09.2020 17:20, Hiroshi Nishida wrote: >> Interestingly, I have exactly the same problem also with CentOS 8 + >> KVM/QEMU. >> >> I would appreciate it if anybody could tell me how to fix this. >> Thank you. > > Hi, > > I think you just

bhyve, sparse disk image and trim support?

Hi, I have been wondering about this with other (commercial) virtualisation solutions in the past. If running on a “disk image” ideally I’d love that image to be a sparse file and ideally I’d love for bhyve/underlying virtualisation for the disk to understand TRIM so in case one deletes

Re: bhyve on reboot loses tap(4) configuration

On 15 Oct 2018, at 16:10, Marcelo Araujo wrote: Em ter, 16 de out de 2018 às 00:06, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> escreveu: Hi, I tried to use bhyve with the tap(4)/vtnet(4) solution as documented in the handbook (tap needs autoopen). However, I am using no br

bhyve on reboot loses tap(4) configuration

Hi, I tried to use bhyve with the tap(4)/vtnet(4) solution as documented in the handbook (tap needs autoopen). However, I am using no bridge(4) interface but a “point-to-point” configuration. Example: guest configures vtnet0 to 192.0.2.2/24 host configures tap0 to 192.0.2.1/24 When

Re: VIMAGE VS virtualbox-kmod

On 15 Dec 2016, at 15:10, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: It'd would be so good if we had a extra pkg for vbox-kmod with vnet support I think that’s your best solution. And possibly not just for vbox-kmod but for all networking kmods? /bz ___

[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

bz added a comment. Can I have you guys have a look at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6924 Thanks REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: nvass-gmx.com, trociny, kristof, gnn, zec, rodrigc,

[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: VIMAGE vs SysV IPC

> On 02 Mar 2016, at 14:53 , Sergey Zakharchenko > wrote: > > Hello, > > As far as I can tell, jails still do not properly encapsulate SysV > IPC. Should I look into VIMAGE or is situation the same there? There’s a patch floating around. We still hope to have the

Re: (VNET) jails not going away

Hi, sorry for the cross-post, Reply-To: set. > On 22 Feb 2016, at 13:41 , Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> > wrote: > > Hi, > > has anyone else experienced VNET jails to not fully go away anymore on a > recent HEAD kernel (or possibly an older kern

VNET jails not going away

Hi, has anyone else experienced VNET jails to not fully go away anymore on a recent HEAD kernel (or possibly an older kernel)? I have test cases with which I can have them in DYING state (see jls -av) for ever or at least more than half a day. I am in the process of trying to find the cause

VNET teardown changes (part I)

Hi, sorry for the cross-post; Reply-To set. I extracted a patch from projects VNET which tries to get the VNET teardown more robust (and in a next step plug the remaining [TCP] memory leaks). If anyone has an interest in testing some parts on a non-production setup (you have been warned)

Re: How to implement jail-aware SysV IPC (with my nasty patch)

On 15 Jun 2015, at 17:10 , kikuc...@uranus.dti.ne.jp wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:53:53 +, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote: Hi, removed hackers, added virtualization. On 12 Jun 2015, at 01:17 , kikuc...@uranus.dti.ne.jp wrote: Hello, I’m (still

[Differential] [Reopened] D1309: VIMAGE PF fixes #1

bz reopened this revision. bz added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Even if this would have been merged properly and not broken the build there's still stuff that is wrong for initialisation with different net contexts in this and that needs to be fixed properly.

Re: RFC: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC

5 years ago? Scary. probbaly worth having someone who is currently active and up to date look at it to see if it's all still correct.. especially the module load/unload stuff. Yeah I popped it up in a browser window to read through it once I have a short break to do that. — Bjoern A. Zeeb

Re: VIMAGE + pf security fix?

On 21 Nov 2014, at 08:06 , Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb b...@freebsd.org wrote: For people to use pf with VIMAGE we first MUST have the security

Re: RFC: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC

otherwise. — Bjoern A. Zeeb Come on. Learn, goddamn it., WarGames, 1983 ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization

Re: RFC: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC

://wiki.freebsd.org/?action=fullsearchcontext=180value=VIMAGEtitlesearch=Titles but didn’t see anything that could be readily turned into a man page. https://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100530-02.vnet.9.html The man page should be in that perforce branch you converted to github. — Bjoern A. Zeeb

Re: RFC: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC

network stack. There’ll be a lot of regression test writing and debugging to be done. That all said, I’d like to see it happen as well, but I’d love to have a lot of the issues being addressed first before putting a date on it to enable it in GENERIC in HEAD. /bz — Bjoern A. Zeeb Come

Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?

those been fixed? No, an old perforce branch of mine had all but the last TCP ones fixed. The code is still there. — Bjoern A. Zeeb Come on. Learn, goddamn it., WarGames, 1983 ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: GPF when doing jail -r, possibly an use-after-free

does not mind, if he does not have time to review -) To me the patch looks wrong; I am wondering if someone broke some other central assumptions but given I cannot currently spend time on this and if it fixes things feel free to go ahead. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb

Re: VMware Tools and Open VM Tools on FreeBSD 9 (the error message from ports)

... /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: note VIMAGE support in UPDATING for the new pf code?

On Sep 7, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Hi, Wouldn't it be good to note in UPDATING that the new pf supports VIMAGE? Well, see the PRs on how much it does. We'll first fix the real (serious) pf bugs and then address the rest of virtualization. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb

Re: epair not reachable outside host

-an, ndp -n, netstat -rn, ... would certainly help. I am aware of one bug that epair can stop passing packets but ETIME currently to look. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family

Re: epair not reachable outside host

and arp -an from inside the VIMAGE as well? Myabe try to ping your default gateway from within the jail first so that there might be actual traffic (or at least an attempt of). /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin

Re: run pf or ipfw within a jail?

On May 6, 2011, at 8:28 PM, Mickey Harvey wrote: Is it possible to run pf or ipfw within a jail? I am running 8.2 and have vimage compiled in the kernel. The next time please post to one list only and not zillions of them. See my reply on freebsd-jail. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb

HEADS UP: will merge VNET socket push back changes to stable/8

Hi, this is a heads up in case anyone is relying on this in private VNET modules or code. I am planning on merging this code to stable/8 probably during the weekend. It should be a NOP for almost everyone, especially if not running a VIMAGE kernel. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb

Re: simulating wireless device (if_alloc panic, VirtualBox, VIMAGE)

On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote: On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote: On Thu, 3 Feb 2011

HEADS UP: tenetative plan to merge VIMAGE parts

out. I'll keep you updated during next week as things progress and might post merge candidate patches for your testing. Regards, Bjoern -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org

Re: VirtualBox + VIMAGE

On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote: On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:18:03 + (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: BAZ On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote: On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:15:46 + (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: BAZ I think you should wrap the CURVNET changes in __FreeBSD_version BAZ

Re: epair: panic after destroying

-- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing

Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: As promised, here are the full logs

Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty

On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Thierry Herbelot wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net

Re: way for determine VIMAGE feature

announcement for VIMAGE: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/net/vnet.c?r1=217203r2=217202pathrev=217203 # sysctl kern.features.vimage it's been MFCed to stable/8 and will be part of FreeBSD 8.3 (it'll miss 8.2). /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have

Re: if_bridge VIMAGE patch

would really appreciate if someone would support the move of the general infrastructure from perforce to HEAD (and help so we can get an exp run for the ports which break similarly). That would help interface and other subsystems (people are doing) immendiately. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb

Re: smbfs on VIMAGE kernel

someone outside the jail (who can see that point in the filesystem) sees it, who's stack do they use to access it? Short answer: you cannot mount any file system inside a jail unless it's marked jail friendly which brings us to ZFS only currently. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb

Re: way for determine VIMAGE feature

kern.features.vimage: 1 kern.features.posix_shm: 1 kern.features.ipsec_natt: 1 kern.features.ipsec: 1 /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1

Re: way for determine VIMAGE feature

On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Subbsd sub...@gmail.com wrote: Hi is there any mechanism to find out from userland  is supports the current kernel VIMAGE or not? something like 'sysctl kern.features.vnet=1

Re: Test Email...

://docs.freebsd.org/mail/current/freebsd-virtualization.html (will rotate at midnight UTC I think). So yes, we received them. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc

Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty

3469 (further tests showed an increase of the routetbl malloc zone by 4MBytes for each vnet jail creation/destruction cycle) Hmm, I had fixed that (somewhere). I'll see where the patch went. You are on 8.1-RELEASE or -STABLE? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome

Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment) This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers the bug on a debug kernel

Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty

application heavily. No, fsck will not help you anything; this is a memory (RAM) not a disk storage/file system problem. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc

Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty

whether to go left or right. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html ___ freebsd

Re: limitations on jail style virtualization

figure out the right jail. I promised the group that after the meeting I would bring up the topic with other interested developers... so here we are.. Tahnks a lot! /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my

Re: limitations on jail style virtualization

are talking to him, even though I got busy the last weeks. As he's piggybacking on VNET/VIMAGE and there'll me more things he and we'll do, there's certainly code going to be shared (I would hope). /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. ks Going

Re: [patch] allow testing VIMAGE with pf in base system only

yes, see the comment at the top of the patch: ! You should not leak /dev/pf into jails for now or they might ! change your rules;-) See devfs, devfs.rules, etc. The jail startup script would usually apply the devfsrules_jail defines in /etc/defaults/devfs.rules. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb

[patch] allow testing VIMAGE with pf in base system only

but should allow using pf in the base system even if VIMAGE is enabled. In case it still panics for you, let me know and include a backtrace in your report. http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100907-01-pf-vnet0.diff /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life

Re: [patch] allow testing VIMAGE with pf in base system only

On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hey, in a way to work on something I needed to be able to at least load pf on my VIMAGE development machine. So I quickly hacked together a patch that does exactly that. I hope it'll apply to HEAD or stable/8 but I didn't test on either

Re: Error while Setting up IPsec in 2 vimages

mode IPsec you do not need gif tunnels at all. You can just setup ipsec. If you need interfaces over ipsec for link state protocols like OSPF you would want to configure transport mode for the gif-tunnel endpoints and only protect those (the gif tunnel) and then use routes. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb I

Re: ppp in vimages?

. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing. ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization

Re: Vimage globals vs structures measurements.

wrt. VIMAGE_GLOBALS even with all the larger changes that went in. I think it's safe to keep them another 4-6 weeks. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http