Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-12-09 Thread John Nielsen
On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu neeln...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-25 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Benjamin Perrault ben.perra...@gmail.com wrote: After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new issues or unknowns what so

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-19 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 16-10-2014 5:00, Anish Gupta wrote: Hi all, The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD. This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pretty much any AMD processor since 2010 will have the features

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-19 Thread Benjamin Perrault
After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new issues or unknowns what so ever. Everything that worked before still works now ( and a few bugs from fixed from HEAD ). Thus, I have gone ahead and pushed r273182 w/ Neel’s patch out to about 80 of the assorted AMD boxes in

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-15 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-10-15 23:00, Anish Gupta wrote: Hi all, The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD. This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pretty much any AMD processor since 2010 will have the features