> On Mar 10, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> Сергей Мамонов wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Yes - zvols looks awesome. But what driver you use for it?
>
> virtio-blk.
>
>> And what
>> about disk usage overhead in guest?
>
> ufs on zvol is faster, either in the parent or a bhyve using virtio-bl
Сергей Мамонов wrote:
Hello!
Yes - zvols looks awesome. But what driver you use for it?
virtio-blk.
And what
about disk usage overhead in guest?
ufs on zvol is faster, either in the parent or a bhyve using virtio-blk,
than zfs. at least for writing, which is my dominant work load. i exp
Hello!
Yes - zvols looks awesome. But what driver you use for it? And what about
disk usage overhead in guest?
virtio-blk doesnt support fstrim (ahci-hd support it, but slower? "*At this
point virtio-blk is indeed faster then ahci-hd on high IOPS*").
In linux && kvm we try used virtio-scsi driver
Pavel Odintsov wrote:
Hello, Dear Community!
I would like to ask about plans for this storage engine approach. I like
ZFS so much and we are storing about half petabyte of data here.
But when we are speaking about vm's we should use zvols or even raw file
based images and they are discarding
Jakub Klama wrote on 03/11/2016 00:13:
Wiadomość napisana przez Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> w dniu 10.03.2016,
o godz. 23:30:
Pavel Odintsov wrote on 03/10/2016 23:24:
Hello!
Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs
state in FreeBSD and their protocol o
> Wiadomość napisana przez Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> w dniu
> 10.03.2016, o godz. 23:30:
>
> Pavel Odintsov wrote on 03/10/2016 23:24:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs
>> state in FreeBSD and their protocol overhead.
>>
>> Coukd y
Pavel Odintsov wrote on 03/10/2016 23:24:
Hello!
Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs
state in FreeBSD and their protocol overhead.
Coukd you aim me to more details?
You can find something at https://github.com/wca/p9fs
On Friday, 11 March 2016, Peter Greha
>Coukd you aim me to more details?
I believe Jakub was working on this.
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2016-February/004102.html
Here's the GitHub Branch: https://github.com/jceel/freebsd/tree/virtfs
Here's the diff:
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/compare/master...
Hello!
Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs
state in FreeBSD and their protocol overhead.
Coukd you aim me to more details?
Thanks!
On Friday, 11 March 2016, Peter Grehan wrote:
> As we have support for ZFS on almost all platforms (I'm speaking about
>> Linux
As we have support for ZFS on almost all platforms (I'm speaking about
Linux and FreeBSD) we could run ZFS subvolumes inside vm's without so much
pain.
So this approach looks very promising and I would like to talk about it ;)
To be clear on this: do you mean something like ZFS DMU passthru to
Hello, Dear Community!
I would like to ask about plans for this storage engine approach. I like
ZFS so much and we are storing about half petabyte of data here.
But when we are speaking about vm's we should use zvols or even raw file
based images and they are discarding all ZFS benefits.
We have
11 matches
Mail list logo