Hello,
I started using bhyve for some of my local setups about one or two years
ago. I'm utilizing rc.local along with some homebrew start_if.NG
scripts to connect tap(4) and ng_bridge(4) with a single vlan(4) uplink
child, so I know bhyve well enough to know that it isn't comparable in
many
Am 22.10.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
…
Test-Runs:
Each hypervisor had only the one bench-guest running, no other
tasks/guests were running besides system's native standard processes.
Since the time between powering up the guest and finishing logon
differed notably (~5s vs. ~20s) f
It would be interesting to test running it under Xen with FreeBSD as the
dom0.
-Dustin
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 1:04 PM Harry Schmalzbauer
wrote:
> Am 22.10.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
> …
> > Test-Runs:
> > Each hypervisor had only the one bench-guest running, no other
> > tasks/g
Am 30.10.2018 um 02:09 schrieb Dustin Marquess:
It would be interesting to test running it under Xen with FreeBSD as the
dom0.
ACK, so do I think. This was on my to-check list, but had to be
postponed until the next HV project legitimates another test setup ;-)
Unfortunately I don't know much
Am 22.10.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
…
Test-Runs:
Each hypervisor had only the one bench-guest running, no other
tasks/guests were running besides system's native standard processes.
Since the time between powering up the guest and finishing logon
differed notably (~5s vs. ~20s)
Hi,
r358848 has been MFC'd to stable/12
Zitat von Harry Schmalzbauer :
Am 22.10.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
…
Test-Runs:
Each hypervisor had only the one bench-guest running, no other
tasks/guests were running besides system's native standard processes.
Since the time between
On 2020-04-19 19:23, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
r358848 has been MFC'd to stable/12
Hello.
Can I ask some questions about this?
First: this patch seems to apply cleanly to 12.1. Is it safe? At least
worth testing?
Second.
IIUIC it's useless to test this on an AMD system, since the pat
* Andrea Venturoli [20200420 10:53]:
> First: this patch seems to apply cleanly to 12.1. Is it safe? At least worth
> testing?
I applied it to my 12.1-RELEASE before it was even committed to head --
the result is awesome.
> Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already
On Mon., 20 Apr. 2020, 7:09 pm Felix Palmen, wrote:
>
> > Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already
> > running as fast as possible. Correct?
>
> I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge
> effect.
>
>
>
^^^ This.
Not all Xeon CPUs ha
On 2020-04-20 12:06, Jason Tubnor wrote:
On Mon., 20 Apr. 2020, 7:09 pm Felix Palmen, wrote:
Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already
running as fast as possible. Correct?
I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge
effect.
I co
> confirm this made a huge effect on a Xeon E3-1220, while it
(obviously) made no difference on a Ryzen 7 2700.
Bhyve is missing support for AMD AVIC, which is interrupt h/w assist
similar to Intel vAPIC. AVIC I think is available only in Ryzen gen1. It is
on my TODO list.
-Anish
On Wed, May 6,
11 matches
Mail list logo
