Hi,
I answer to this mail because it's related to the discussion in this thread.
As told I have my Debian Dom0s and now I wan't to create a FreeBSD Xen PV
DomU. Does I really need a HVM guest like described here:
Hi Lukas,
[...] I don't know whether there is support for Xen Dom0 on FreeBSD.
Unfortunately there isn't.
I read that NetBSD support Xen Dom0 [...]
I haven't tried myself, but apparently NetBSD works rather well as Dom0. That
has long been on my list of things to test, though :)
Not sure
What gave you that idea? The patches in that directory are the differences
between the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and the one I used to build the AMI.
Oh, must have been wishful thinking then that it might go into FreeBSD and not
remain a bunch of separate patches... :)
The csup'ed source
I'm experiencing dreadful performance (sync throughput less than 1MB/sec)
with both replication options, and am not quite sure how to troubleshoot
that, because the network speed between two DomU's is otherwise well beyond
50MB/sec.
Have done some further testing. This only happens with
int max = 24 /* MAX_SKB_FRAGS + (rx-status = RX_COPY_THRESHOLD) */;
I've just recompiled XENHVM setting this for a quick test:
int max = MAX_SKB_FRAGS;
Before, I was receiving said error message a lot; now it's gone. Also,
throughput has massively increased!
My test setup was:
2x
Hi guys,
After FreeBSD 8.0-RC2 is working well (for me) on Xen 3.3.1, I somehow
made an interesting observation:
Even if the FreeBSD domU does absolutely nothing, each of the assigned
vCPUs will be reported by xentop as using 15%-25% CPU time. It doesn't
matter, if domU is running with 1
Hi guys,
After FreeBSD 8.0-RC2 is working well (for me) on Xen 3.3.1, I somehow
made an interesting observation:
Even if the FreeBSD domU does absolutely nothing, each of the assigned
vCPUs will be reported by xentop as using 15%-25% CPU time. It doesn't
matter, if domU is running with 1
