[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39764) corrupted strings in nl.po

2007-10-08 Thread Daniel Markstedt
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39764 > > [dmarks - Sun Oct 07 11:37:58 2007]: > > There seems to be a large number of corrupt strings in nl.po in S2_1, > S2_2, and trunk. > Corrupted strings marked as fuzzy in S2_1 so that translators can find and correct them. Please forward-p

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39766) yet some outdated into in helpdata.txt

2007-10-08 Thread Daniel Markstedt
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39766 > $s helpdata_fix.diff Description: Binary data ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39765) optimized resources change with terrain changes

2007-10-08 Thread William Allen Simpson
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39765 > In the earlier reports (PR#14969), only part of the proposed patch was committed to 2.1, as that was easiest to quickly review. However, the remainder of the patch optimized the performance by a significant change to the packet and map gener

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39756) [Bug] Compatibility problem with ReportFreezeFix

2007-10-08 Thread Pepeto _
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39756 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Lun. Oct. 08 16:54:16 2007]: > > On 07/10/2007, Pepeto _ wrote: > > > > > > > > > What is the actual cause of this bug? > > > > The cause is that the science report is not updated when the bulbs stock > > changes. >

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39756) [Bug] Compatibility problem with ReportFreezeFix

2007-10-08 Thread Marko Lindqvist
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39756 > On 07/10/2007, Pepeto _ wrote: > > > > > > What is the actual cause of this bug? > > The cause is that the science report is not updated when the bulbs stock > changes. When is it updated? Only when thaw packet arrives? > I don't see th

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39756) [Bug] Compatibility problem with ReportFreezeFix

2007-10-08 Thread Pepeto _
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39756 > > [wsimpson - Dim. Oct. 07 14:57:44 2007]: > > Pepeto _ wrote: > > Why 2.0.10 should be different? > > > Because 2.0.10 does not yet exist. So, you mean that you don't want fix or, at least, open a bug report because the version is not rel