URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40280
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Jun 16 01:14:01 2008]:
2008/6/15 Madeline Book:
This gave me another idea along the same lines: PREREQS_KNOWN.
I were worried this would turn out too long, but in the end I'm quite
happy with it. In
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40280
Discussion about this started in #38372.
Attached patch renames:
player_invention_is_ready() - player_invention_reachable()
TECH_REACHABLE - TECH_PREREQS
COLOR_REQTREE_REACHABLE_GOAL - COLOR_REQTREE_PREREQS_GOAL
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40280
2008/6/15 Madeline Book:
If the goal is to make the names more intuitive from the
point of view of an English speaker, then in my opinion
HAS_PREREQS (or maybe even HAVE to implicitly
indicate that it is I/you/we the player that has
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40280
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jun 15 14:01:02 2008]:
Discussion about this started in #38372.
Attached patch renames:
TECH_REACHABLE - TECH_PREREQS
COLOR_REQTREE_REACHABLE - COLOR_REQTREE_PREREQS
COLOR_REQTREE_REACHABLE_GOAL -
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40280
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jun 15 19:07:47 2008]:
Actually, HAS_PREREQS sounds like technology that has prereqs
defined, not one that somebody has prereqs researched for.
Yes that ambiguity is a little annoying. :/
How about
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40280
2008/6/15 Madeline Book:
This gave me another idea along the same lines: PREREQS_KNOWN.
I were worried this would turn out too long, but in the end I'm quite
happy with it. In addition to this change, I moved word GOAL before
