http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 >
What is the purpose of having resources defined in the
civ1 terrain ruleset, but with 'name' field set to "unused"?
It seems completely unnecessary, and in fact S2_1 does not
have such "dummy" entries.
I bring this up because they annoyingly
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jul 09 02:01:59 2008]:
>
> Madeline Book wrote:
> > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 >
> >
> > What is the purpose of having resources defined in the
> > civ1 terrain ruleset, but with 'name' fi
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 >
Committed to S2_2 (r15046) and trunk (r15045).
--
喉が渇いたんだ。
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.or
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 >
Madeline Book wrote:
> http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 >
>
> What is the purpose of having resources defined in the
> civ1 terrain ruleset, but with 'name' field set to "unused"?
> It seems completely unnecessary, and in