[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40368) S2_2/trunk "unused" resource definitions in data/civ1/terrain.ruleset ?

2008-07-08 Thread Madeline Book
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 > What is the purpose of having resources defined in the civ1 terrain ruleset, but with 'name' field set to "unused"? It seems completely unnecessary, and in fact S2_1 does not have such "dummy" entries. I bring this up because they annoyingly

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40368) S2_2/trunk "unused" resource definitions in data/civ1/terrain.ruleset ?

2008-07-19 Thread Madeline Book
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jul 09 02:01:59 2008]: > > Madeline Book wrote: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 > > > > > What is the purpose of having resources defined in the > > civ1 terrain ruleset, but with 'name' fi

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40368) S2_2/trunk "unused" resource definitions in data/civ1/terrain.ruleset ?

2008-07-24 Thread Madeline Book
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 > Committed to S2_2 (r15046) and trunk (r15045). -- 喉が渇いたんだ。 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.or

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40368) S2_2/trunk "unused" resource definitions in data/civ1/terrain.ruleset ?

2008-07-08 Thread Jason Dorje Short
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 > Madeline Book wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40368 > > > What is the purpose of having resources defined in the > civ1 terrain ruleset, but with 'name' field set to "unused"? > It seems completely unnecessary, and in