[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Update of bug #18217 (project freeciv): Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => cazfi Open/Closed:Open => Closed _

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Follow-up Comment #13, bug #18217 (project freeciv): see also bug #19153 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Follow-up Comment #12, bug #18217 (project freeciv): > Then why was that status variable recently added if it's not > even supposed to be used? The patch about the lua script cleanup had a lon development. This is something there I did miss to remove the definition. > I'm just fixing patch from l

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Follow-up Comment #11, bug #18217 (project freeciv): Then why was that status variable recently added if it's not even supposed to be used? I'm just fixing patch from late August that doesn't apply because that variable now exist (and obviously didn't back in August)

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Follow-up Comment #10, bug #18217 (project freeciv): > Attached patch fixes trunk for me. I had to disable one warning, > which conflicts with gtkitemfactory.h: See also my Mail to the list: This is a known bug which will not be fixed due to compatibility reasons (see the documentation in ./doc

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Follow-up Comment #9, bug #18217 (project freeciv): Attached patch fixes trunk for me. I had to disable one warning, which conflicts with gtkitemfactory.h: /* We use () here to mean unspecified arguments. This is deprecated * as of C99, but we can't change it without breaking compatibility. *

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Update of bug #18217 (project freeciv): Depends on: => patch #2778 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sen

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #18217 (project freeciv): - Fixed typo in option name - Fixed typo in flags-variable name - Fixed reversed enable/disable logic (file #13456) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: IgnoreAcceptWarn_18217-2.d

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #18217 (project freeciv): > One noteworthy thing about these warnings is that they don't > cause failure even with -Werror. > I don't know why that is (gcc feature or bug) and how long that > will last. It lasted this far. Now they cause failure on my system. _

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Update of bug #18217 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress => None Assigned to: cazfi => None ___ Follow-up Comment #5: In trunk these sho

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #18217] GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used

Update of bug #18217 (project freeciv): Summary: variable 'xxx' set but not used => GCC 4.6: variable 'xxx' set but not used ___ Reply to this item at: