Update of bug #19149 (project freeciv):
Planned Release: 2.5.0 = 2.4.0, 2.5.0
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?19149
___
Message sent
Update of bug #19149 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #19149 (project freeciv):
This variable is set in DISEMBLE_RGBA but not used in
ALPHA_BLEND; is a reduced version of DISEMBLE_RGBA really
needed?
That didn't look too bad option to me. It's not like we need to duplicate the
code, but the full RGBA version can use RGB
Update of bug #19149 (project freeciv):
Category:None = client-sdl
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?19149
___
Message sent
Update of bug #19149 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
___
Follow-up Comment #7:
updated patch; it uses the solution proposed by Jason Dorje Short jdorje in
bug #18217:
- use
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #19149 (project freeciv):
Would it be possible to solve this by using macro from jdorje's patch in bug
#18217?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?19149
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #19149 (project freeciv):
Would it be possible to solve this by using macro from jdorje's
patch in bug #18217?
I did remember that something about the warning was on the list but I did not
remembered there I did read it. Now I have done all the work jdorje did again
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #19149 (project freeciv):
Now I have done all the work jdorje did
I had already fixed most instances, and had patches for some of the remaining
ones, by the time jdorje did his patch. I'm afraid I had no patch for this
particular problem, but should go through
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #19149 (project freeciv):
part 1 is commited; a solution for part2 is still missing ...
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?19149
___
Message sent
