[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4388] Requirement range "Team"

Follow-up Comment #5, patch #4388 (project freeciv): > I noticed that REQ_RANGE_WORLD is still handled separately from > REQ_RANGE_ALLIANCE, REQ_RANGE_TEAM in some is_xxx_in_range() > functions despite being supported by players_in_same_range(). > Is that intentional? On a quick look, I think m

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4388] Requirement range "Team"

Follow-up Comment #4, patch #4388 (project freeciv): Building on top of this patch, I noticed that REQ_RANGE_WORLD is still handled separately from REQ_RANGE_ALLIANCE, REQ_RANGE_TEAM in some is_xxx_in_range() functions despite being supported by players_in_same_range(). Is that intentional? _

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4388] Requirement range "Team"

Update of patch #4388 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4388] Requirement range "Team"

Update of patch #4388 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress => Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #2: New version, ready for commit. > * Untested Now lightly tested. > * Not written help yet beca

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4388] Requirement range "Team"

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4388 (project freeciv): Very early WIP. Not a commit candidate because: * Untested * Not written help yet because patch #4400 still WIP * Not updated README.effects because patch #4401 still WIP One notable decision: wrt bug #21415, I have decided to have the AI consi

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4388] Requirement range "Team"

Update of patch #4388 (project freeciv): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => jtn Planned Release: => 2.6.0

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4388] Requirement range "Team"

Update of patch #4388 (project freeciv): Depends on: => patch #4406 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sen

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4388] Requirement range "Team"

URL: Summary: Requirement range "Team" Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Thu Jan 2 12:04:56 2014 Category: None Priority: 5 - Normal Status: No