Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4679 (project freeciv):
I'd like to have a bit longer transition period for porting all the rulesets
I'm maintaining.
It's up to debate whether we should keep nreqs even in 2.6 stable releases as
an transition period. It's much easier to port other parts of the
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #4679 (project freeciv):
Is the transition important from an engine perspective or a ruleset
perspective? If the former, there are bugs to fix, and if the latter, parsing
nreqs-using rulesets doesn't need to be linked to having nreqs support in the
engine.
There are
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4679
Summary: Remove nreqs support entirely
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Wed 30 Apr 2014 01:01:42 PM JST
Category: general
Priority: 5 - Normal
