[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Update of patch #6452 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Done Assigned to:None => cazfi Open/Closed:Open => Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Follow-up Comment #8, patch #6452 (project freeciv): - Do not use README.civ2civ3 at all -- Do not copy Makefile.am or README.civ2civ3 along the rest of the civ2civ3 directory, before applying the patch. (file #25628, file #25629) ___ Ad

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Follow-up Comment #7, patch #6452 (project freeciv): I haven't come up with a better idea, considering all your points. > 2. Will our policy be such that in case of the new sandbox > ruleset changes can be so disruptive that savegame > compatibility is not guaranteed over consecutive freeciv >

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Update of patch #6452 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress => Ready For Test Planned Release: 3.0.0 => 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #6: > 1) We start sand

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Follow-up Comment #5, patch #6452 (project freeciv): So we want patch #6485 in S2_6 already. That makes decision even more hairy. The mixture of doing huge changes to experimental ruleset in S2_6 and then archiving it in 3.0 while switching to sandbox ruleset sounds like a "worst of both worlds"

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Update of patch #6452 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => In Progress ___ Follow-up Comment #4: I should have given reasons I want this in correct order. I've been thinking bringing classic

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Follow-up Comment #3, patch #6452 (project freeciv): I'm inclined to agree with lachu; if we (or someone else) wants to preserve experimental-as-it-was-in-2.5 or whatever, we can maintain it in freeciv-modpack for 2.6 and later. (If experimental is renamed without countermeasures, there's not even

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Update of patch #6452 (project freeciv): Status:None => Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Initial patch attached. First copy civ2civ3 directory as sandbox and civ2civ3.serv as sandbox.

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #6452 (project freeciv): I think that Freeciv developers should copy experimental ruleset into new name. What about savegame compatibility? Who cares? If someone have played in experimental ruleset, I think it do this for testing reasons. __

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #6452] sandbox ruleset

URL: Summary: sandbox ruleset Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Tue 20 Oct 2015 07:21:07 AM EEST Category: rulesets Priority: 5 - Normal Statu