On 5 February 2013 02:42, Jacob Nevins
<0jacobnk.fc...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>
> So if we can put up with perhaps the next release or two not having the
> ability to be built for 64-bit ARM without minor buggering about, then
> the problem will solve itself.
Ok, I actually assume that on
Marko Lindqvist writes:
> This came up from Debian adding aarch64 support:
> http://suihkulokki.blogspot.fi/2013/02/on-behalf-of-aarch64-porters.html
>
> In short: aarch64 support is very new addition to autotools, so for
> tarball to support it, it must be generated by latest autotools.
>
> What
This came up from Debian adding aarch64 support:
http://suihkulokki.blogspot.fi/2013/02/on-behalf-of-aarch64-porters.html
In short: aarch64 support is very new addition to autotools, so for
tarball to support it, it must be generated by latest autotools.
What versions of autotools are we currentl
