On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:28:09 +0100
LoneVVolf wrote:
>[Analysis omitted]
Good catch.
> I've attached a patch file created with diff -aur to change the code in
> src/net/sf/freecol/common/io/FreeColDirectories.java
Applied in git.05e5f6a.
Cheers,
Mike Pope
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
On 12/18/2013 06:55 AM, Michael Vehrs wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 11:08 AM, Michael T. Pope wrote:
>> In git.1a5417c the old version of FreeColDialog has finally gone away,
>> and with it the getResponse family of bugs. Or at least I can not
>> reproduce it any more. As previously admitted, there are
On 01/27/2014 11:29 AM, Michael T. Pope wrote:
The question is why freecol doesn't see my system as xdg-compliant,
although the fallback
directories for XDG_DATA_HOME & XDG_CACHE_HOME are present, and
XDG_CONFIG_HOME is set.
You are in a better place to answer that than anyone else. Add a few
tr
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:08:09 +0100
"Stian Grenborgen" wrote:
> Another problem with using JDialog is that they don't mix well with
> JInternalFrame. Layering, focus etc is handled by the windowing system for
> the former, while JDesktopPane handles it for the latter. That's why the
> ChooseFoundin
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:18:42 +0100
LoneVVolf wrote:
> Looked at the code again, and it seems my code changes are unnecessary
> so you can ignore those.
Glad that resolved itself while I was on the road. Note that the intent
with this migration is to be very conservative. In my experience users
