On 23.11.2012 11:09, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:02:10 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>
>> I can't reproduce that. Can you provide the delinquent savegame?
>>
> Attached.
>
>
>> However, I noticed that I could not place a city next to the border of
>> an Apache camp. Ther
On 19.11.2012 11:36, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:32:10 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>
>> As it turns out, csDisposeSettlement doesn't produce ideal results,
>> either, as you can easily check with the included patch.
>>
> Alas no. I am blocked by the crash below which is u
On 19.11.2012 18:08, Michael Vehrs wrote:
> On 19.11.2012 11:36, Michael T. Pope wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:32:10 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As it turns out, csDisposeSettlement doesn't produce ideal results,
>>> either, as you can easily check with the included patch.
>>>
On 19.11.2012 11:36, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:32:10 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>
>> As it turns out, csDisposeSettlement doesn't produce ideal results,
>> either, as you can easily check with the included patch.
>>
> Alas no. I am blocked by the crash below which is u
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:32:10 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
> As it turns out, csDisposeSettlement doesn't produce ideal results,
> either, as you can easily check with the included patch.
Alas no. I am blocked by the crash below which is unrelated to the patch.
However I am not particularly surprised
On 18.11.2012 14:15, Michael Vehrs wrote:
On 18.11.2012 12:29, Michael T. Pope wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:07:06 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
Wouldn't it be better if tiles recorded who claimed them, and possibly
also how they were claimed? Firstly, that would make the "next claimant"
c
On 18.11.2012 12:29, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:07:06 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be better if tiles recorded who claimed them, and possibly
>> also how they were claimed? Firstly, that would make the "next claimant"
>> code in csDisposeSettlement obsolete.
>>
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:07:06 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better if tiles recorded who claimed them, and possibly
> also how they were claimed? Firstly, that would make the "next claimant"
> code in csDisposeSettlement obsolete.
True, but existing code is `cheap', more per-tile storage
Wouldn't it be better if tiles recorded who claimed them, and possibly
also how they were claimed? Firstly, that would make the "next claimant"
code in csDisposeSettlement obsolete. Secondly, it would allow for
future extensions, such as claiming regions and actually owning them
after all previ
