On 11-04-28 at 07:08pm, Thomas Lord wrote:
> Allocating Assigned Routing Numbers
> in a Distributed and Decentralized Way
>
>
> NEED FOR AN OVERLAY NETWORK
>
> Programs for Freedomboxes can not assume that each box has a
> stable IP address. Boxes are most often l
On 29 April 2011 01:18, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> no technology should be unique to FreedomBoxes
What, then, makes them unique?
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/list
hi Jonas,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> all parts of the system must be...
>
> a) The product must be long-term maintainable.
> b) All services contribute to "the silverlining of the cloud"
sry for my ignorance, but what does "silverlining" means?
> In my opinion a) is b
Le vendredi 22 avril 2011 à 12:32 +0200, Jaromil a écrit :
> >I was a Kickstarter contributor and have so far been lurking on
> >the list - and I'm wondering if any project leaders have emerged,
> >or what the (concrete) plan is. The "Roadmap" page on the
> >Freedombox site states w
Hello,
sry for my ignorance, but what does "silverlining" means?
Eben Moglens talk on Debconf 2010:
''How We Can Be the Silver Lining of the Cloud''
see e.g. here:
http://penta.debconf.org/dc10_schedule/events/641.en.html
Cheers,
Erich
___
Freedom
On 11-04-29 at 11:15am, Jaromil wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > all parts of the system must be...
> >
> > a) The product must be long-term maintainable.
> > b) All services contribute to "the silverlining of the cloud"
>
> sry for my ignorance, but what does "si
On 11-04-29 at 02:08am, Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 29 April 2011 01:18, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > no technology should be unique to FreedomBoxes
>
> What, then, makes them unique?
That they were $foo in putting a particular set of freedom-enabling
technologies into an ugly beige box, and
Hello,
I'm looking into some hardware to buy to start testing few
Freedombox-related
ideas. I came to the conclusion that having an hard drive inside the box
is a must
for the following reasons:
1) Storage space: I need lots of GB to store photos, etc.
2) Wear: I'm not very comfortable on hav
On 11-04-29 at 07:10am, Lorenzo wrote:
> I'm looking into some hardware to buy to start testing few
> Freedombox-related ideas. I came to the conclusion that having an hard
> drive inside the box is a must for the following reasons:
>
> 1) Storage space: I need lots of GB to store photos, etc.
>
Anthony Callegaro wrote:
> I am trying to get some time to implement a Dropbox replacement
I think this is a great goal because it is fairly simple and
widely used. For the same reasons, I would like to help
create a solution for email.
But, while the software is already available, what I see mi
Hi Patrick,
On 11-04-29 at 09:01am, Patrick Anderson wrote:
> Is there room on this list for the discussion of sharing hardware and
> working-out the complexities of co-ownership, or is that beyond the
> scope of what FreedomBox is meant to cover?
I do believe it is beyond the scope of FreedomB
*
*
Mobster Mobydick
GoogleVoice 949-436-6799
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 22:48 -0700, Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 28 April 2011 19:08, Thomas Lord wrote:
> >
> > All of the routing IDs we'll talk about here are written
> > as 10 character numbers in base 36 (more than 51 and less
> > than 52 bits).
>
> Base 34 is better, eliminating L and 0 fro
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 22:54 -0700, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 28 April 2011 19:12, Thomas Lord wrote:
> > Notice that *unlike* DNS hostnames, overlay network hostnames
> > have an ugly base 36 number tacked on the end, following a
> > percent sign
>
> Would the application layer of the stack hide
Jonas, thanks for this:
> I strongly recommend to work on this independently from the FreedomBox
> project.
> I don't mean "go away - you are disturbing this list" but rather that no
> technology should be unique to FreedomBoxes - so I suggest to either
> remove the term "Freedomboxes" from y
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> It is _very_ exciting to hear about all the great things people are
> working on inventing, and all the different kinds of hardware people are
> working on getting freedom-enabling technologies into besides Plug
> devices.
Just to be clear,
I'm not talking about inventin
On 11-04-29 at 11:13am, Patrick Anderson wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > It is _very_ exciting to hear about all the great things people are
> > working on inventing, and all the different kinds of hardware people are
> > working on getting freedom-enabling technologies into besides Plug
> > d
> Patrick Anderson wrote:
>> I'm talking about making Free as in Freedom Cloud
>> Computing by addressing the issues that arise when
>> we try to share hardware.
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> How does that relate to "the silverlining of the cloud" as defined by
> Eben Moglen and the common attractor a
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Anthony Callegaro wrote:
Le vendredi 22 avril 2011 ?? 12:32 +0200, Jaromil a ??crit :
I was a Kickstarter contributor and have so far been lurking on
the list - and I'm wondering if any project leaders have emerged,
or what the (concrete) plan is. The "Roadmap"
19 matches
Mail list logo
