On 3 July 2011 00:58, John Walsh wrote:
>
>
>> Behalf Of Tony Godshall
>
>> > ... The same principle exist between a reporter and a
>> whistleblower.
>> > The pseudonymity article suggests the technology exists to protect
>> > freedom fighters through unlinkable pseudonyms.
>>
>> It's important, I
Every freedombox has some unique identifier or even a profile whitch
could be so " annonymous" as the user want,
it could be like a Vcard, avatar/profilepict , with public keys,
tags, information about the user what he "likes" or is "interested"
in. Remember it should be social !! ;)
Thi
Hi Tony,
> -Original Message-
> From: apgodsh...@gmail.com [mailto:apgodsh...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Tony Godshall
> Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2011 2:04 AM
> To: fiftyf...@waldevin.com
> Cc: freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Relationship driven
Hi Melvin,
> From: Melvin Carvalho [mailto:melvincarva...@gmail.com]
> > Basically at myopenid.com you can create different "Personas"
> > (profiles of information), which you choose at the time you
> login with
> > openid. For me you could have a friend persona, a sibling
> persona etc.
>
Hi Ian,
> I think the best way to do this is through something like a
> dynamicDNS centralized service. Currently, the network effect
> is on the side of intermediated social networks because
> having everyone's contacts in one place makes it much easier
> to find each other. Same logic behi
