On 02/28/2017 09:52 AM, Aaron Ferrucci wrote:
>> # James Valleroy writes:
>> If your FreedomBox is behind a router (i.e. not publicly accessible from
>> the Internet), then yes, typically you will want the "FreedomBox WAN"
>> connection to be in the internal zone.
>>
>> Currently the default config
Hi,
i've just seen the proposal of the mail server support implementation on
the debian wiki [0]. i just wanted to say, that i think thats an really
interesting task, and if the proposal will in fact be a gsoc project
this year, i'll try to apply for that.
i'm a debian user for a long time and i w
> # James Valleroy writes:
> If your FreedomBox is behind a router (i.e. not publicly accessible from
> the Internet), then yes, typically you will want the "FreedomBox WAN"
> connection to be in the internal zone.
>
> Currently the default configuration is like this:
> - If there is only one netwo
On 02/28/2017 04:27 PM, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote:
[...]
> I would be happy to mentor this particular project and also like to
> propose another project idea one similar lines to implement new card
> based user interface for FreedomBox based on mray's design[3]. I will
> update the project ideas pag
On Saturday 25 February 2017 11:58 AM, soumya vadlamannati wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am a student from International Institute Of Information Technology,
> Hyderabad in India, and have enjoyed contributing to open source
> projects for the past few months. I have seen a project called "Refact
