Re: [Freedombox-discuss] connection/firewall problem with privoxy

2017-02-28 Thread James Valleroy
On 02/28/2017 09:52 AM, Aaron Ferrucci wrote: >> # James Valleroy writes: >> If your FreedomBox is behind a router (i.e. not publicly accessible from >> the Internet), then yes, typically you will want the "FreedomBox WAN" >> connection to be in the internal zone. >> >> Currently the default

[Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox GSOC Mailserver

2017-02-28 Thread Birger Schacht
Hi, i've just seen the proposal of the mail server support implementation on the debian wiki [0]. i just wanted to say, that i think thats an really interesting task, and if the proposal will in fact be a gsoc project this year, i'll try to apply for that. i'm a debian user for a long time and i

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] connection/firewall problem with privoxy

2017-02-28 Thread Aaron Ferrucci
> # James Valleroy writes: > If your FreedomBox is behind a router (i.e. not publicly accessible from > the Internet), then yes, typically you will want the "FreedomBox WAN" > connection to be in the internal zone. > > Currently the default configuration is like this: > - If there is only one

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Outreachy Application

2017-02-28 Thread Sunil Mohan Adapa
On 02/28/2017 04:27 PM, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote: [...] > I would be happy to mentor this particular project and also like to > propose another project idea one similar lines to implement new card > based user interface for FreedomBox based on mray's design[3]. I will > update the project ideas

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Outreachy Application

2017-02-28 Thread Sunil Mohan Adapa
On Saturday 25 February 2017 11:58 AM, soumya vadlamannati wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am a student from International Institute Of Information Technology, > Hyderabad in India, and have enjoyed contributing to open source > projects for the past few months. I have seen a project called