[Freedombox-discuss] Prospective packages for FreedomBox

2017-12-01 Thread Joseph Nuthalapati
Hello everyone, I took the list of packages from https://github.com/Kickball/awesome-selfhosted and ran a script to determine which of them are available on Debian testing. I used the `apt show` command for this and maybe had a lot of false negatives, but the 85 packages I got out of the list is s

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Prospective packages for FreedomBox

2017-12-01 Thread Joseph Nuthalapati
Sorry for just dumping the list. Here's a well-compiled gist with proper links and formatting. https://gist.github.com/JosephKiranBabu/4cfe79614657ac1b5c54f691f736688a -- Joseph Nuthalapati On Friday 01 December 2017 04:05 PM, Joseph Nuthalapati wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I took the list of pa

[Freedombox-discuss] Cubieboard5 Deemed Unsuitable?

2017-12-01 Thread Josh Blagden
I was on https://wiki.debian.org/CheapServerBoxHardware and I noticed that the Cubieboard3 was recomended, but the Cubieboard5 wasn't. Why is this? Why was the Cubieboard5 deemed " possibly using less than ideal components or wiring for essential parts" while the Cubieboard3 was not? Josh _

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Cubieboard5 Deemed Unsuitable?

2017-12-01 Thread Stefan Monnier
> I was on https://wiki.debian.org/CheapServerBoxHardware and I noticed > that the Cubieboard3 was recomended, but the Cubieboard5 wasn't. Why is > this? Why was the Cubieboard5 deemed " possibly using less than ideal > components or wiring for essential parts" while the Cubieboard3 was not? Proba