[Freedombox-discuss] Service restored

The relocation of FreedomBox Foundation services (as previously announced) should now be complete. Please let me know if you observe any problems. -- Daniel Gnoutcheff Systems Administrator Software Freedom Law Center signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox Foundation scheduled server downtime

, ftp.freedombox.org, freedomboxfoundation.org, and the Mumble/Murmur server at fbx.freedomboxfoundation.org. Thanks in advance for your patience. Later, -- Daniel Gnoutcheff Systems Administrator Software Freedom Law Center signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Freedombox-discuss] Progress call Sunday

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly progress call at 17:00 UTC Sunday (the 25th) on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls (I won't be there, as I'll be at LibrePlanet with D. Haidar helping man our exhibition table.) signature.asc

[Freedombox-discuss] Progress call Sunday

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly progress call at 17:00 UTC Sunday (the 25th) on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

[Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox server outage

Shortly before 2 AM EST (07:00 UTC), one of my main VM hosts failed. As a result, all freedombox project servers hosted by SFLC (including the webservers for freedombox.org, ci.freedombox.org, ftp.freedombox.org, and freedomboxfoundation.org) went down. Service should have been restored by 10 AM

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Shutting down lists.freedomboxfoundation.org

On 01/18/2018 02:31 PM, Pierre L. wrote: > Hey! > > This current list will stay alive ? (Freedombox) Yes, for now. is hosted by Debian and will not be not affected by the shutdown of lists.freedomboxfoundation.org. However, I believe that the server

[Freedombox-discuss] Shutting down lists.freedomboxfoundation.org

Hello all, On Jan 25th, I will shut down the Sympa mailing list server at lists.freedomboxfoundation.org. This server used to host a number of mailing lists for the project, but none have seen any use since 2012. While I will retain my backups of the server, I don't have immediate plans to post

[Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox servers down

Hello all, I'm afraid that SFLC's Internet access link has been down since around Jan 6th 00:00 UTC (Friday, Jan 5th 7:00 PM EDT). As a result, freedombox.org, freedomboxfoundation.org, ftp.freedombox.org, and ci.freedombox.org are all down. The ISP has confirmed the outage and is working on

[Freedombox-discuss] freedomboxfoundation.org content refresh

Hello all, As promised in the last progress call, I've updated freedomboxfoundation.org with content drafted by Danny Haidar. Hopefully, we won't have quite so many people confused by years-out-of-date material. Much of the old material, e.g. the old news archive, is still accessible by those

[Freedombox-discuss] [Reminder] Network maintenance for freedombox.org, freedomboxfoundation.org, etc.

Reminder: at 18:00 UTC tomorrow, I will temporarily cut Internet access for several FreedomBox project servers -- including the webservers -- to perform network maintenance. I will reconnect them by 18:15. My original announcement, for more detail: > Starting at 18:00 UTC on Jan 3rd, 2018, I

[Freedombox-discuss] Progress call Sunday

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly progress call at 17:00 UTC Sunday (the 24th) on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Recall that in the last week of November, I rebuilt the server with a new TLS certificate, so if you haven't joined

[Freedombox-discuss] Network maintenance for freedombox.org, freedomboxfoundation.org, etc.

Starting at 18:00 UTC on Jan 3rd, 2018, I will be doing maintenance work on network equipment in the SFLC office. Because of this work, the following VMs will have no Internet access for up to 15 minutes: - fbfwiki - fbfvm1 - fbfvm2 - fbfvm3 - fbfvm4 - fbx This implies that freedombox.org

[Freedombox-discuss] Hack call tomorrow

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly hack call at 14:00 UTC tomorrow on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Recall that I recently rebuilt the server with a new TLS certificate, so you'll probably get a certificate warning when you

[Freedombox-discuss] fbx.freedomboxfoundation.org mumble server certificate change

o please let me know if there are problems. Thanks for your patience! Have a good one, Daniel Gnoutcheff signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian

[Freedombox-discuss] Hack call

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly hack call at 14:00 UTC tomorrow on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Have a good one, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

[Freedombox-discuss] Hack call

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly hack call at 14:00 UTC tomorrow on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Have a good one, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

[Freedombox-discuss] Hack call

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly hack call at 14:00 UTC tomorrow on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Have a good one, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Virtual Image credentials...

x/Manual#FreedomBox.2FHardware.2FVirtualBox.VirtualBox For further technical support, please try our support forums: https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/Support Have a good one, Daniel Gnoutcheff Systems Administrator, Software Freedom Law Center signature.asc Descript

[Freedombox-discuss] Hack call

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly hack call at 14:00 UTC tomorrow on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Have a good one, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

[Freedombox-discuss] Progress call

As a reminder, we're scheduled for our monthly progress call at the usual place: https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Later, Daniel (I probably won't make it, as I'm going to LibrePlanet this weekend.) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Freedombox-discuss] Hack call

Reminder: we're scheduled to have our monthly hack call at 14:00 UTC tomorrow on the usual Mumble/Murmur server. https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Have a good one, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Can't get android phone to connect to radicale.

On 02/06/2017 11:15 PM, A. F. Cano wrote: > Failed to obtain certificate for domain .freedombox.rocks: Failed > authorization procedure. .freedombox.rocks (http-01): > urn:acme:error:connection :: The server could not connect to the client > to verify the domain :: Could not connect to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Ideas for GSoC 2017

On 02/04/2017 12:02 PM, Tong Hui wrote: > For refactorying freedombox foundation website, to finish this idea, It > is better working with website administrator. Indeed, thanks for drawing my attention to this entry. This is relevant to me as I think I'm the only one with access to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Can't get android phone to connect to radicale.

On 02/04/2017 01:52 PM, A. F. Cano wrote: > === Android log > EXCEPTION javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Connection closed by peer This may be a sign that SSL certificate verification is failing. Stuffing that message into DuckDuckGo found me a fellow who got the

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] error connecting to wiki

On 11/21/2016 03:23 PM, John Light wrote: > Apologies if this is not the right place to report this, but I seem to be > having an error connecting to the FreedomBox wiki at > https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ > > I am receiving a 403 error. Is anyone else seeing this? It's been working for me.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Joining a mesh network with BATMAN

On 11/21/2016 08:58 AM, Bastien Rocheron wrote: > Do those versions match or are they maintained separately? I mean, if I > install the image version 0.9, does it mean I'll have Plinth 0.9? Yes, the pre-built images are generally labeled according to the major plinth version that they contain.

[Freedombox-discuss] AR9271 USB dongle vs. network-manager

It appears that our favorite ath9k_htc free-firmwared wifi dongle does not work with current (1.4.x) network-mananger versions. In my tests, it is unable to associate with open wifi networks (at least), and when it is used in AP mode ("connection sharing"), other devices in turn are unable to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox 0.9 images

[Resending to list. Gods, I'm more sleep deprived than I realized.] On 07/15/2016 10:55 AM, Masoud Abkenar wrote: > Hello, > > I see the news item, but it is dated June 15th, 2016 rather than July > 15th, 2016. Yes, just fixed it, thanks. I welcome the day when we can kill this particular

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Apt anomaly when going through privoxy.

On 07/02/2016 09:42 PM, A. F. Cano wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:36:22AM -0400, Daniel Gnoutcheff wrote: >> On 06/28/2016 08:59 PM, A. F. Cano wrote: >>> I have noticed that if privoxy is enabled, when doing an apt download from >>> internal machines, if it fails,

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Apt anomaly when going through privoxy.

On 06/28/2016 08:59 PM, A. F. Cano wrote: > I have noticed that if privoxy is enabled, when doing an apt download from > internal machines, if it fails, aptitude retries but starts at the > beginning again. My Google-fu suggests that Privoxy filters out the "Range" HTTP request header field by

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] 100% CPU load by an apache2 process (Freedombox)

On 02/19/2016 11:07 AM, Fred Le Meur wrote: > Hello, > > i think i'm facing a bad case sometime, not anytime > > i get one core 100% CPU load by an apache2 process : This may be due to a bug in (mod-)GnuTLS: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.outoforder.modules/69 Seems that moving

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox firstboot fails to configure AP mode on otherwise-working WiFi dongles

On 02/22/2016 02:31 PM, Daniel Gnoutcheff wrote: > Hey, > > I've been finding that when I boot a fresh freedombox with 0.7 images > and with a WiFi dongle installed, no WiFi AP is created. I ended up editing 05_network to get this working. Honestly, I can't understand how the scrip

[Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox firstboot fails to configure AP mode on otherwise-working WiFi dongles

Hey, I've been finding that when I boot a fresh freedombox with 0.7 images and with a WiFi dongle installed, no WiFi AP is created. If I somehow manage to get into the freedombox anyway, I find that there exist a few NetworkManager connection profiles for the dongle, but neither specify AP mode.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Help creating landing page

On 02/07/2016 02:49 PM, mray wrote: > Hi Gnoutcheff, > > what kind of hacking do you talk about? We certainly could need manpower > for nice and clean frontend job. I'm supposed to help with the HTML/CSS coding. I offered to do so during the last fbx progress call. signature.asc Description:

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Help creating landing page

On 01/30/2016 01:02 AM, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote: > Let us meet Tomorrow Sunday, Jan 31, 18:00 GMT (our usual time). Ooof, sorry I missed this, I only just read this now. Did we keep meeting notes? Is it time for me to start hacking on something? (I know I was supposed to help implement this.)

[Freedombox-discuss] fbx 0.7 dreamplug install report

half hours (!) on this device. As a side effect, I stumbled upon plinth issue #381 [4] on the way, which I cleared with 'sudo systemctl restart plinth' over SSH. HTH! Have a good one, Daniel Gnoutcheff [1] http://ftp.skolelinux.org/pub/freedombox/0.7/freedombox-unstable-nonfree_2015-12-13_dreamplug-armel

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] fbx 0.7 dreamplug install report

On 01/22/2016 05:23 PM, James Valleroy wrote: > Thanks for the report. Just checking, do you have network interfaces > named "mlan0" and "uap0"? Neither exist. The ifaces available are lo, eth0, eth1, tun0, and wlan0. According to udevadm, wlan0 is an SD8688 driven by the 'libertas' driver. The