Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Promoting Freedom Box

J David Eisenberg wrote: > "breaking chains" is a fairly > universal symbol of freedom ... > work that in with a plug-in box I'm having visions of Houdini inside a box wrapped in chains. Now just to portray the notion that those chains are breaking or somehow being circumvented... __

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Promoting Freedom Box

Paul Gardner-Stephen wrote: > How about a black cube, turned slightly to one side, with "FreedomBox" > written on it, surrounded at the base by a mess of broken chain? That makes sense - just show the 'result'. This makes me wonder what caused the chains to break... Now I'm thinking of the cube

[Freedombox-discuss] Other FreedomBox projects

Just so we are aware of other projects that happen to have the same name... http://FreedomBox.net >>Freedom is a complete (SMB) service solution that effectively replaces your IT infrastructure with enterprise system performance added with managed resources and Disaster Recovery capabilities all f

[Freedombox-discuss] Fwd: Free Fiber to the Home

-- Forwarded message -- From: Free Fiber to the Home Date: Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:28 AM Subject: Free Fiber to the Home Free Fiber to the Home

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Project plan?

ssion of sharing hardware and working-out the complexities of co-ownership, or is that beyond the scope of what FreedomBox is meant to cover? Sincerely, Patrick Anderson Economic Systems Debugger http://SourceFreedom.BlogSpot.com ___ Freedombox-discuss

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Project plan?

Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > It is _very_ exciting to hear about all the great things people are > working on inventing, and all the different kinds of hardware people are > working on getting freedom-enabling technologies into besides Plug > devices. Just to be clear, I'm not talking about inventin

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Project plan?

> Patrick Anderson wrote: >> I'm talking about making Free as in Freedom Cloud >> Computing by addressing the issues that arise when >> we try to share hardware. Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > How does that relate to "the silverlining of the cloud" as defined by

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Should we change the mailing list format?

Chris Troutner wrote: > Would it be a good idea to move this mailing list to a different format? I’m > thinking of something that would combine a mailing list with a feature like > Digg where people could have some way of voting on or ‘like’ing a > submissions so that the most meaningful (as determ

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

>    550-Blacklisted URL in message. (o p e ncu.org) It seems to be saying your message was Blacklisted because it links http://openCU.org ___ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

oh, I see, the extra spaces causes the link to become ncu.org ___ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Working Groups

ired for the things they need, there would never be any more begging owners to do the right thing, for the customer and vendor are then one and the same. Sincerely, Patrick Anderson Economic Systems Debugger http://ImputedProduction.BlogSpot.com ___

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Working Groups

> http://ImputedProduction.BlogSpot.com oops, that is: http://ImputedProduction.Blog.com This explains how users can co-own the Physical Sources of the products they need for their own mutual benefit, with the return for those investments being the product itself. See also http://SourceFreedom.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Freedom databases >>> Hosting

Is there any chance we could co-own some of these 'FreedomBases' as small groups while retaining our Freedom? Is it possible to share hardware for the benefit of that group without taking Freedoms from others? If so, then we should discover and define what those groups must do if they are to avo

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FBX general system architecture

Brandon Invergo wrote: > schematic of the main components comprising a freedombox? > I have two in mind, one showing the software stack and the other one > maybe showing a proposed network structure (though that seems to > still be up in the air, regarding mesh networking, etc). Maybe a compariso

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] China praises UK's "Internet Censorship Plans"

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > rather than waiting for it to drop into peoples' laps Is that different from what are you are waiting for? ___ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.or

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] China praises UK's "Internet Censorship Plans"

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/08/16/0019248/China-Praises-UK-Internet-Censorship-Plan > > have i said enough times now that the > software actually needs to be written We have plenty of software. What we need is hardware. We must co-own the network. We,

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] The Freedombox Economy

Melvin Carvalho wrote: > Now every Freedombox should come pre installed > with a balance of 100 "freedom coins" This would be easy at first, since FCs would be worth nothing, and so easy to mine. But imagine half-way through, when each FC is worth 10 cents - you would then be giving $10 worth of

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox For Cloud Services

committing to achieve future production in return for others committing to do the same for us, then we can specialize without passing tokens. Sincerely, Patrick Anderson http://ImputedProduction.BlogSpot.com ___ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freed