On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:33:58 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Tim Small t...@seoss.co.uk wrote:
On 17/08/11 15:00, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Marvell is pretty good. Whether that is through Marvell's
contribution
or not I don't know, but in
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
so it depends what's more important to the freedombox foundation. to
put out a message that it's ok that CPU Manufacturers are
dishonourable and only provide information under NDA, and we, the
FreedomBox Foundation fully
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Tim Small t...@seoss.co.uk wrote:
On 17/08/11 15:00, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Marvell is pretty good. Whether that is through Marvell's contribution
or not I don't know, but in terms of what the end user gets to work
with, it's seldom matched and hard to beat.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
in the first place), why has the MX53QSB not been chosen as the board
for the freedombox foundation to honour its obligations to its
kickstarter sponsors?
Another thing worth considering is the cost. SheevaPlugs go for
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:21:43 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net
wrote:
in the first place), why has the MX53QSB not been chosen as the
board
for the freedombox foundation to honour its obligations to its
On 17/08/11 15:00, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Marvell is pretty good. Whether that is through Marvell's contribution
or not I don't know, but in terms of what the end user gets to work
with, it's seldom matched and hard to beat.
They are definitely better than some, but OTOH, they don't appear to
Damn, multiple mailing lists, some missing bits... Difficult to follow.
so it depends what's more important to the freedombox foundation. to
put out a message that it's ok that CPU Manufacturers are
dishonourable and only provide information under NDA, and we, the
FreedomBox Foundation
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:38:02 +0200, Sébastien BOCAHU
li...@zecrazytux.net wrote:
Also, I believe that such a freedom box should take the place of the
ISP box.
Otherwise, there could be networking troubles (not evereryone knows
how to
configure his box, do some NAT and so on) and what's the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:33:58PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
interesting.
so.
with that in mind, why has the marvell CPU been chosen as the
flagship product for the freedombox foundation to honour its
obligations to its kickstarter sponsors?
so i'll ask again: with
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:40:00PM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Another thing worth considering is the cost. SheevaPlugs go for
about $99, and they don't require anything else to be functional -
just plug in and go. The Freescale boards you mention cost 50% more
(without the discount), and still
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something here, but if if you want to do that you
might as well scrap the Freedombox project and use one of the new
Samsung routers with OpenWRT. OpenWRT is a full fat Linux and runs on a
lot of
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Lennart Sorensen
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:33:58PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
interesting.
so.
with that in mind, why has the marvell CPU been chosen as the
flagship product for the freedombox
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
snip unrelatedness
corr, bloody hell this was hard to find. it should be right up there
on the overview specs, and it isn't. _eventually_ i found this:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:39:17 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
[ um... freedombox people... tell me... why was the shitty little
NDA-loving armv5 marvell sheeva guwwu pwug chosen over the
freedom-respecting really rather dishy little IMX53QSB? i realise
it's good to
On 08/13/2011 02:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
This sort of question should always be considered in the context of the lead
time, i.e. in 9 months time when TI and NVidia and Freescale (etc.) have
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 08/13/2011 02:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
ok, right. continuing on the discussion of upcoming and/or available
Cortex A9 systems, i heard back from one of the CPU manufacturers
(can't say which one),
Hello everyone,
I'm glad to hear that we advanced in negotiations even that little. In
my opinion, just getting started is already good invariably of how we
do it. Starting with entry level mainstream SoC is completely OK. We
can scale up it later as many times as we want.
About the price.
17 matches
Mail list logo
