DT> I heard that you were considering a proprietary executable compression
DT> scheme for FreeDOS.
could you explain 'proprietary' ?
is everything non-GPL 'proprietary' ?
the compressor is available to everyone, but simply does not allow
free distribution of compressed executables, if used comerc
Hi!
10-Фев-2004 12:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Turner) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DT> I heard that you were considering a proprietary executable compression
DT> scheme for FreeDOS. I'm just writing to let you know the licensing and
DT> freedom implications of this.
DT> The compressor rewrites a
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, David Turner wrote:
> I heard that you were considering a proprietary executable compression
> scheme for FreeDOS. I'm just writing to let you know the licensing and
> freedom implications of this.
Now that you're here anyway ;) I have some questions too:
first of all many F
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Gregory Pietsch wrote:
> Well, if you don't want to put the configure script in there, at least
> leave everything else in there so that the configure script can be
> reproduced with standard tools such as autoconf!
well configure.in is at least small :) Anyway it's Bernd's de
At Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:48pm -0500, David Turner wrote:
> I heard that you were considering a proprietary executable compression
> scheme for FreeDOS. I'm just writing to let you know the licensing and
> freedom implications of this.
>
> The compressor rewrites an executable (in the FreeDOS case,
Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Gregory Pietsch wrote:
I just checked the source for edlin from the Odin 0.6 package, and it's
missing various files such as the configure script. Please put these
files back into the distribution, as they are referenced in the README
and INSTALL files t
Steve Nickolas wrote:
At Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:38pm -0500, Gregory Pietsch wrote:
I just checked the source for edlin from the Odin 0.6 package, and it's
missing various files such as the configure script. Please put these
files back into the distribution, as they are referenced in the README
and
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:35:27 +, Bryce wrote:
Oh - i could be wrong about the laptop with the 720k disks being a 286, some pages peg it as an 80C88, others a 286...
It's probably a 80C88, so the ODIN.720 disk had I prepared wouldn't work because I had forgotten the --8086 UPX switch. So I just
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:48:43 -0500, David Turner wrote:
I heard that you were considering a proprietary executable compression
scheme for FreeDOS. I'm just writing to let you know the licensing and
freedom implications of this.
The compressor rewrites an executable (in the FreeDOS case, one unde
A suggestion from Bernd Blaauw:
Patrick, I'm not subscribed yet, so maybe you can give the hint of
SETUP /NM /IS
(IS=ignore scandisk)
(NM=NoMachineDetection)
I just wanted to confirm that /nm switch fixed the error
message of windows 98 setup.
Hi all,
I very much agree that AUTOCONF is a waste of space for compiling EDLIN
for DOS. A 2 line BATCH script would have been enough. Please offer a
download with the sources and a classic Makefile but no AUTOCONF stuff.
People with very strange BSD versions on their toaster or whatever can
still
I heard that you were considering a proprietary executable compression
scheme for FreeDOS. I'm just writing to let you know the licensing and
freedom implications of this.
The compressor rewrites an executable (in the FreeDOS case, one under
the GPL), inserting decompression code. This creates a
12 matches
Mail list logo
