[Freedos-devel] compiling Freedos

2004-02-15 Thread Adam Peart
I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile the kernel freecom under borland c or djgpp? --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD

list question was Re: [Freedos-devel] compiling Freedos

2004-02-15 Thread Adam Peart
The email I sent was from my pop account adamatcapprogramming.com, but the address I subscribed with is dosatcapprogramming.com. The header says Envelope-to: dosatcapprogramming.com, but the from says From: Adam Peart adamatcapprogramming.com So that's why there's a duplicate post because

Re: [Freedos-devel] compiling Freedos

2004-02-15 Thread Adam Peart
At 12:13 PM 02/15/2004, you wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:31:41 -0500, Adam Peart wrote: I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile the kernel freecom under borland c or djgpp? About the kernel: The official and recommended compiler is Open Watcom, but you can

Re: [Freedos-devel] compiling Freedos

2004-02-15 Thread Steve Nickolas
At Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:31am -0500, Adam Peart wrote: I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to compile the kernel freecom under borland c or djgpp? Borland. DJGPP can't do 16-bit. -uso. --- SF.Net is sponsored

Re: [Freedos-devel] drive detection problems using atapicdd

2004-02-15 Thread Jim Hall
Arkady V.Belousov wrote: Hi! 13--2004 17:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenneth J. Davis) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: KJD please run atapichk.exe from KJD http://www.darklogic.org/fdos/projects/atapicdd/ More precise URL, please. Binary is here: