Hi!
13-Мар-2004 15:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD> internals, I need to check the values that MS-DOS or DR-DOS returns for EMS
MD> Accordingly, I have uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware/downloads a file
MD> called EMSREP.ZIP, with the EMSREP.EXE report prog
Hi!
__O\_/_\_/O__
-?
FreeDOS Debug v 0.98 help screen
-a
0E02:0100 mov [400],ds
^ Error
_
O/~\ /~\O
--
ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads
At 12:33 PM 3/14/2004 +0300, you wrote:
>Hi!
>
>13-íÁÒ-2004 15:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>MD> internals, I need to check the values that MS-DOS or DR-DOS returns for EMS
>MD> Accordingly, I have uploaded to ftp://ftp
ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads
Thank you, now it works! Here are my test results. See below.
(MS-DOS 7.1 and HIMEM.SYS 3.95 from Windows 98 Second Edition
IBM Expanded Memory Manager 386 Version 4.50 from PC-DOS 2000
Command line: /I=B000-B7FF /I=F000-F6FF /X=CC00-D0FF NOEMS V)
Reported INT
At 01:54 PM 3/14/2004 +0200, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
>>ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads
>
>Thank you, now it works! Here are my test results. See below.
>(MS-DOS 7.1 and HIMEM.SYS 3.95 from Windows 98 Second Edition
>IBM Expanded Memory Manager 386 Version 4.50 from PC-DOS 2000
>Command line
Hi Arkady,
In case you didn't do that already, did you remember to fill a bugitem
in bugzilla?
Maybe it is the only way that Paul Vojta may know about this bug (if he
is not subscribed).
Aitor
Arkady V.Belousov escribió:
Hi!
__O\_/_\_/O
> ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads
A: Test machine 440BX 512 MB (brand A)
B: Test machine 440BX 256 MB (brand B)
- OpenDos 7.01:
- OpenDos 7.01 (DrDos) EMM386 NOEMS on A:
Reported INT 67h value of 025C:006B
EMS function 40h, Get Status, failed
EMS function 41h, Get Page Frame, failed, addr
Hi!
14-Мар-2004 13:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa Merino) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ASM> In case you didn't do that already, did you remember to fill a bugitem
ASM> in bugzilla?
I have no online.
ASM> Maybe it is the only way that Paul Vojta may know about this bug (if he
ASM> is
Hi,
Did some test of the latest EMM38664.EXE.
It didn't like DOS32A and PMODE/W, when quit from programs have DOS32a
will have:
PANIC: MCB chain corrupted
System Halted.
When the program have PMODE/W:
Illegal Instruction occurred
CS=0F8A IP=0544 SS=1145 SP=0400 DS= ES=0F8A
EAX= EBX
Hi,
Johnson Lam escribió:
Also want to confirm: when EMM38664 have "NOEMS", there's no UMB, am
I correct?
Well, at least in MS-EMM386 you have
EMM386 NOEMS => UMBs only
EMM386 RAM[=range] => EMS and UMBs
Aitor
---
This SF.Net email is sponso
At 12:54 PM 03/14/2004, you wrote:
Hi,
Did some test of the latest EMM38664.EXE.
I tested it with Descent 1. I couldn't install it in dos, I forget what
the error message was, but when I installed it in Windows, then booted into
dos, it worked fine, with & without "noems". I've got to figure o
I was wondering how to use memdisk to load the freedos iso up. I'm using
bwcd and I can't figure out how to do it, even though it says it can load
iso's up.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial prese
> I tested it with Descent 1. I couldn't install it in dos, I forget
> what the error message was, but when I installed it in Windows, then
> booted into dos, it worked fine, with & without "noems". I've got to
> figure out how to slow the game down though because on a 1.8 ghz, it
> runs to fast.
Hi!
Next version of BOOTFIX (1.2) placed on site of Michael Devore
(ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/bootf12.zip). You may use this
utility at least to view drives properties, but it also diagnoses the
properties if they are valid.
In next versions will be addeded support to readi
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Michael Devore wrote:
> If you would, please put this version of EMM386 through suitable tests,
> particularly with protected mode/DOS extender stuff, and let me know the
> results.
Still have the same (exit) problem as last time. Also something weird is
going on with NOEMS n
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:15:39 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Aitor,
>Well, at least in MS-EMM386 you have
>EMM386 NOEMS => UMBs only
>EMM386 RAM[=range] => EMS and UMBs
I'm happy to see EMM386 working better now but still can improve.
Looking forward to a new version.
Rgds,
Johnson.
--
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:53:20 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Adam,
>I tested it with Descent 1. I couldn't install it in dos, I forget what
>the error message was, but when I installed it in Windows, then booted into
>dos, it worked fine, with & without "noems". I've got to figure out how to
>slow the
At 01:54 AM 3/15/2004 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Did some test of the latest EMM38664.EXE.
>
>It didn't like DOS32A and PMODE/W, when quit from programs have DOS32a
>will have:
>
>PANIC: MCB chain corrupted
>System Halted.
>
>When the program have PMODE/W:
>
>Illegal Instruction occurred
>CS
At 01:23 AM 3/15/2004 +, Bart Oldeman wrote:
>Still have the same (exit) problem as last time. Also something weird is
>going on with NOEMS now:
>
>device=emm38664.exe noems /verbose
>
>NOEMS ...
>EPROM at c000:, size 32 KB (the video bios)
>XMS largest block 0x2fbc0(195520), XMS total mem
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:42:29 -0600, Michael Devore wrote:
Opcodes @CS:IP 0F 20 C0 66 A3 AA 01 66
Looks like they are using another illegal instruction in V86, based on
the 0F 20 prefix, which I'll have to emulate in EMM386.
The 2 instructions above (excluding the last 66) are:
mov eax
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:52:29 -0600, Michael Devore wrote:
total(available) EMS 6(5) pages = 96(80) kByte
I'm going to pump up the default EMS allocated by 96K for NOEMS, which
should always leave at least a little bit for VCPI and give more for EMS
internal tables with lots of RAM, like you have
At 08:02 AM 3/15/2004 +0200, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
>>>total(available) EMS 6(5) pages = 96(80) kByte
>>I'm going to pump up the default EMS allocated by 96K for NOEMS, which should always
>>leave at least a little bit for VCPI and give more for EMS internal tables with lots
>>of RAM, like you
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially e
23 matches
Mail list logo
