Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 5.0 v0.4

2004-06-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 18--2004 16:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eduardo Casino) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EC * APPEND is now a COM file (smaller), as suggested by Eric, but EC it keeps the EXE extension. Is it .COM file renamed to .EXE or this is .EXE file

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 5.0 v0.4

2004-06-19 Thread Eduardo Casino
Hi, Arkady, El sáb, 19-06-2004 a las 08:49, Arkady V.Belousov escribió: EC * APPEND is now a COM file (smaller), as suggested by Eric, but EC it keeps the EXE extension. Is it .COM file renamed to .EXE or this is .EXE file with header, as in .COM? If first, then I against this,

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 5.0 v0.4

2004-06-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19--2004 09:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eduardo Casino) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EC * APPEND is now a COM file (smaller), as suggested by Eric, but EC it keeps the EXE extension. Is it .COM file renamed to .EXE or this is .EXE file with header, as in .COM? If first, then I against

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 5.0 v0.4

2004-06-19 Thread Eduardo Casino
Hi, El sáb, 19-06-2004 a las 10:19, Arkady V.Belousov escribió: This is reason, why I wrote COM2EXE and convert CTMOUSE.COM into .EXE. This adds only 32 bytes of header, so, overhead is small, but safety and convenience for user is much increased. You may get my COM2EXE from CuteMouse

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 5.0 v0.4

2004-06-19 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
I have done a couple of testings with /X:ON and DIR FD-APPEND + NT/CMD.EXE is NOT affected MS-APPEND/NT + FreeCOM is AFFECTED Thus my guess is that it is, I would say, COMMAND.COM who has to care about this (NOTE: I filled a bug report about this long time ago, but it was a guessing,

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 5.0 v0.4

2004-06-19 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote: I have done a couple of testings with /X:ON and DIR FD-APPEND + NT/CMD.EXE is NOT affected MS-APPEND/NT + FreeCOM is AFFECTED and the COMMAND.COM on WinNT (at least Win2000 and XP have both a cmd.exe and a command.com)? I'll retest FreeCOM behaviour, but

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 5.0 v0.4

2004-06-19 Thread Eduardo Casino
Hi, Bernd! El sáb, 19-06-2004 a las 14:50, Bernd Blaauw escribió: I'll retest FreeCOM behaviour, but already experienced when A: and B: are equal that FreeCOM asks for disk change about 3 times, when using APPEND B:\;B:\DRIVER /X:ON hopefully this is now gone, but we'll see (if I find

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 5.0 v0.4

2004-06-19 Thread Eduardo Casino
Hi! El sáb, 19-06-2004 a las 14:30, Aitor Santamaría Merino escribió: I have done a couple of testings with /X:ON and DIR FD-APPEND + NT/CMD.EXE is NOT affected MS-APPEND/NT + FreeCOM is AFFECTED Thus my guess is that it is, I would say, COMMAND.COM who has to care about this

[Freedos-devel] generatin binary files by TLINK

2004-06-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! Some years ago Bart shows, how to generate binary files (file with any ORG, not only 100h) by TLINK. Unfortunately, I lost those description. Does someone knows how to do this? --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004

Re: [Freedos-devel] generatin binary files by TLINK

2004-06-19 Thread Steve Nickolas - Using Windoze
Arkady V.Belousov wrote: Hi! Some years ago Bart shows, how to generate binary files (file with any ORG, not only 100h) by TLINK. Unfortunately, I lost those description. Does someone knows how to do this? Explicitly provide an extension other than .COM for the output file and supply the /t