On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:42:55 +0100 (BST), you wrote:
Hi Alex,
>It's still x86, so why not recode some of the bits in x86 assembler?
We need someone CAPABLE of doing this, and he really WANT to do this.
I know someone got the 1st qualification but not the 2nd.
Rgds,
Johnson.
-
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:12:19 -0700, you wrote:
Hi Blair,
>Hi all. I just finished porting the latest clamscan to DOS/DJGPP and
>it is ready for testing by brave people (and I have only tested the
>help screen myself, as I am not brave :)). To test it you will need
>to download the virus databas
Hello Alex,
> It's still x86, so why not recode some of the bits in x86 assembler?
any reason why YOU don't do it ?
tom
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Develo
Hi!
19-Авг-2005 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A> - OpenWatcom has a lot of BC's DOS's functions, or one of the BC's
A> functions to do the same.
OW is highly QC/MSC compatible, compatability with BC was never
planned. :(
Hello Alex,
Friday, August 19, 2005, 10:48:17 PM, you wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, tom ehlert wrote:
>> Hello Alain,
>>
It should provide its
own library routines so it's easy to use different compilers.
>>
>>> I believe that if somone is *really* motivated, this can be done.
>>>
>
Hi all. I just finished porting the latest clamscan to DOS/DJGPP and
it is ready for testing by brave people (and I have only tested the
help screen myself, as I am not brave :)). To test it you will need
to download the virus databases from the clamav homepage and (at least
for now) use the --da
