On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:43:17 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Bernd,
>Johnson's site is lacking your 7Zip compressor/decompresser binary
>(7z.exe) which is able to run on DOS, yet you provide files in 7z format
>there.
Blair told me use "HX-DOS Extender" to run 7-Zip command line.
Rgds,
Johnson.
-
> You do a great job about porting the linux apps to DOS. I have a question -
> do they support the long file names?
Thanks, and yes, they should, as they were compiled in an LFN
environment and DJGPP itself supports LFNs.
---
SF.Net email is S
> Anyway, to my knowledge it's GPL, which means for example SHSUCDX won't
> be able to handle any ZISOFS (compressed ISO) file, because it uses
> another license (freeware, with source available)
Perhaps if Jason extended SHSUCDX to accept modules, this would become
possible. Then it would also b
Whoa!
You do a great job about porting the linux apps to DOS. I have a question -
do they support the long file names?
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Developmen
Hi, adding to the wishlist...
> IMHO, both are needed: DJGPP is perfect for compiling Unix tools.
> Openwatcom is very good for new or simple programs.
DJGPP is good for tools which would suffer from the usual real
mode limitations (only little memory reachable directly / usual
pointer trickery
Wesley Parish escreveu:
I'm wondering what the advantage of choosing any one particular C compiler
over the rest, might be. (Admittedly, one major advantage of DJGPP and
OpenWatcom is portability, which TurboC/C++ doesn't have; nobody's every
ported BCC to anything other than a *DOS that I'm
IMHO, both are needed: DJGPP is perfect for compiling Unix tools.
Openwatcom is very good for new or simple programs. Porting from Borland
to OpenWatcom is ususaly not too dificult.
I have a lib of functions for OW that contain all the screen functions,
this is the worst part of converting. If
David O'Shea schreef:
Fixed, I put a download link for the existing releases on
there and mentioned that they are pretty much identical to what is in
CVS. I also put an "alpha" version on there which is my code in its
current state which I think is not too bad..
not too bad at all, indeed.
Blair Campbell schreef:
There was an outdated mkzftree.exe compiled, so I updated it to 1.06.
If anyone wants it, e-mail me.
BTW, if anyone doesn't know what mkzftree is, it is a tool to work
with zisofs trees.
and if anyone doesn't know what zisofs trees are?
Anyway, to my knowledge it's GPL
Hi Bernd,
>Having all of my notes on a web page that everyone can see,
> and using a tool which is very quick to edit those nodes so that I am
> more likely to keep them up-to-date, will be of great benefit to
> everyone when I suddenly disappear from the community :)
But the page doesn
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 03:21, Blair Campbell wrote:
>
> > Is OpenWatcom's DOS compiler 16-bit DPMI too?
>
> No. Openwatcom is only capable of producing straight 16-bit apps or
> 32-bit DPMI apps.
I'm wondering, does anyone have a set of test apps that can test the
comparative performances of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
