Hi. I've been having a problem with EMM386 where I always get the
message 'UMBs unavailable!' even when using the option X=TEST or
I=TEST. Those are the only options that I am giving EMM386. One
thing I noticed differently, though, was that this seems to happen
only when I've booted kernel.sys d
David O'Shea wrote:
...
No. FreeDOS doesn't splits HMA to blocks with headers, similar to MCB
in conventional memory.
Could we maybe store a char or word in HMA which is at a standardized
location which we can read if we know we're running FreeDOS? I'm not sure
what MS-DOS does in this r
Hi!
9-Дек-2005 13:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Fnd what this char shoukd show?
"And what this char should show?"
BB> Nothing, just a marker for where buffers would start (until top of HMA).
First at all, buffers may be not
Arkady V.Belousov schreef:
Fnd what this char shoukd show?
Nothing, just a marker for where buffers would start (until top of HMA).
Strangely MEM /A does mention "11KB" free in HMA, but to my knowledge
the kernel fills remaining HMA space entirely with buffers if DOS=HIGH.
Bernd
---
Hi!
9-Дек-2005 22:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David O'Shea) wrote to
:
>> No. FreeDOS doesn't splits HMA to blocks with headers, similar to MCB
>> in conventional memory.
DO> Could we maybe store a char or word in HMA which is at a standardized
DO> location which we can read if we know we're runni
David O'Shea schreef:
Hi Bernd, Eric, all,
Were any of the bugs I created/propagated resolved while I was away or were
any other changes made? I want to get back to fixing bugs but want to make
sure I'm working with the latest sources.
Nothing changed.
Items to do:
-the "files=" has non-NLS
Hi Bernd, Eric, all,
Were any of the bugs I created/propagated resolved while I was away or were
any other changes made? I want to get back to fixing bugs but want to make
sure I'm working with the latest sources.
Thanks!
David
---
This SF.ne
Hi Arkady,
> From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:38:43 +0300 (MSK)
> >> This is not strange, because 29 buffers fit to remains of HMA,
> DO> Anyone know if there's a way that MEM can check what the kernel is
storing
> DO> in HMA, specifically with regard
