Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 19:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
name in man' pages? For example: "sed(1)", "dirent(3)", etc.
RR> That's a section number. 1 = Commands, 2 = System calls, ... see
RR> http://gmanedit.sour
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 19:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> name in man' pages? For example: "sed(1)", "dirent(3)", etc.
RR> That's a section number. 1 = Commands, 2 = System calls, ... see
RR> http://gmanedit.sourceforge.net/man7.html
Hm. I ne
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 15:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Berger) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AB> Before someone comments, I don't like causeway since it uses the hard
AB> disk as heap and I don't know how to turn this off.
Probably this helps:
http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforg
At 03:12 PM 3/14/2006 -0300, Andreas Berger wrote:
I would like to add one issue:
With open watcom I can no longer use the WDOSX stub. The villain is wlink.
If I use the Watcom 11 (or 10) wlink everything is OK.
Before someone comments, I don't like causeway since it uses the hard disk
as he
I would like to add one issue:
With open watcom I can no longer use the WDOSX stub. The villain is
wlink. If I use the Watcom 11 (or 10) wlink everything is OK.
Before someone comments, I don't like causeway since it uses the hard
disk as heap and I don't know how to turn this off. This is re
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> Dumb question from newbie in man: what mean number in parentesis after
> name in man' pages? For example: "sed(1)", "dirent(3)", etc.
That's a section number. 1 = Commands, 2 = System calls, ... see
http://gmanedit.sourceforge.net/man7.html
Robert Riebisch
--
B
Hi!
Dumb question from newbie in man: what mean number in parentesis after
name in man' pages? For example: "sed(1)", "dirent(3)", etc.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applica
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> You sometime express yourself too vivid :) (and hard to understand by
> non-native English speakers). :( How uncorn relates to installer platforms
> completness?
Unicorns (as the DOS installer) are a legend or at least very rare. ;-)
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Sof
Салям!
14-Мар-2006 03:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> "DOS installer"? There is no such bestie in OpenWatcom. There is only
MD> There have been discussions of such a beastie, recent ones in fact. So the
MD> DOS installer is real insofar
At 11:10 AM 3/14/2006 +0300, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
14-íÁÒ-2006 00:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> Most of the DOS installer concerns
"DOS installer"? There is no such bestie in OpenWatcom. There is only
one giant open-watcom-c-win3
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 09:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> one giant open-watcom-c-win32-1.4.exe installer with unknown format (no
>> possibility to manually unpack required files) and requirement of WINNT
>> (Win32) to run.
RR> Just do a "pkunzip -
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> "DOS installer"? There is no such bestie in OpenWatcom. There is only
> one giant open-watcom-c-win32-1.4.exe installer with unknown format (no
> possibility to manually unpack required files) and requirement of WINNT
> (Win32) to run.
Just do a "pkunzip -d open-
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 00:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Ok. But note: many issues are minor (installer shows "2,047MB" when
>>more space available) and/or not very interested for other peoples (spaces
>>in help files). Also, in next separate
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 00:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> As far as differences between WCC and WPP, Michal previously made pretty
MD> clear that the two compilers are separate entities, and them operating
MD> differently is not a major concern for
14 matches
Mail list logo
