On 9/14/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 14-Сен-2006 05:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
> freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> BC> I think what we REALLY need is a free PASCAL compiler that can
> BC> generate 16-bit code.
>
> I think, Modula (which
Hello,
2006/9/14, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> 14-Сен-2006 05:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
> freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> BC> I think what we REALLY need is a free PASCAL compiler that can
> BC> generate 16-bit code.
>
> I think, Modula (which
I received this from Eric in PVT. I am copying it here because I just
agree with almost all of it!!
I will just add atha almost all big DOS programs that are performance
aware do most disk access in big chunks buffering it in memory (even
write cache is available in CodeBase). This make them e
http://draak.sf.net/
No, it's not complete, and no, the public version hasn't been updated
in over a year, but it is out there, and it does currently produce
(albeit little) 16-bit dos assembler. I still work on it on occasion,
but always accept patches. On another note, if someone is adventu
Hi!
14-Сен-2006 05:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC> I think what we REALLY need is a free PASCAL compiler that can
BC> generate 16-bit code.
I think, Modula (which is superset of Pascal, if you mean Pascal, but
not Turbo Pascal) is orde
Hi!
14-Сен-2006 13:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ladislav Lacina) wrote to
:
LL> Well, there are another two quite good BASIC compilers: Turbo Basic and
LL> Power Basic.
LL> You can both download from my site at: http://www.laaca.borec.cz/pascal.htm
Both are proprietary closed-source commercial sof
Eric Auer wrote:
> I would appreciate some FreeBASIC command line options to
> set default types (QB: single for variables, 16bit for INTEGER,
> FB: integer for variables, 32bit for INTEGER). That would
> make FreeBASIC ("command line optionally"!) behave even more
> like QuickBASIC, where appropri
Hi!
14-Сен-2006 21:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ladislav Lacina) wrote to
:
LL> The compiler itself can work in 32-bit protected mode but the generated
LL> programs should work in 16-bit real.
>> AM> Today thare is a discussion about making a full modern compiler for
>> AM> either C++ or Pascal. It simp
The compiler itself can work in 32-bit protected mode but the generated
programs should work in 16-bit real.
- Original Message -
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] 32 bit
> Hi!
>
> 14-Сен-2006 14:45
Hi!
14-Сен-2006 14:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain M.) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AM> Today thare is a discussion about making a full modern compiler for
AM> either C++ or Pascal. It simply will not *fit* in 16 bit memory!!!
Because many current compilers are 32-bit programs,
>> You are talking of our sister project FreeDOS-32:
>> http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/
>
> No actually I was talking about starting another 16bit compiler project.
I believe that FreeDOS 32 has a big problem: they have to do it all from
scratch.
I believe further that a different aproach
Florian Xaver escreveu:
> I think, the DJGPP developers would be very happy if you would help them -
> I think they could release a new version, but are to busy for that... ^^
Well, that is a great idea...
-
Using Tomcat
Imre Leber escreveu:
> Well I for one think that FreeDOS should move into the 32bit realm after
> version 1.
I agree, but for a different reason: not even here on the FreeDOS list
could we find any real 16 bit machine just for testing...
IMHO DOS has to remain DOS. That is definite. But moder
Does this mean that people are actually still going to write software for
FreeDOS?
That is material for a whole different thread.
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From: Blair Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 02:14 PM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
I think what we REALLY need is a free PASCAL compiler that can
generate 16-bit code. I know for a fact that the OpenWatcom project
would welcome a PASCAL frontend to their toolset. Any takers?
On 9/14/06, Ladislav Lacina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, there are another two quite good BASIC c
Well, there are another two quite good BASIC compilers: Turbo Basic and
Power Basic.
You can both download from my site at: http://www.laaca.borec.cz/pascal.htm
(The site is in czech and there is a big title "pascal" but don't panic -
theese download links are at the bottom of page.)
- Origin
Hi Imre,
> Well I think what we are realy missing is a good BASIC compiler.
> Something like QuickBASIC. Free BASIC has something like that but
> that works only in 32 bit.
As http://www.freebasic.net/index.php/about?section=diff
shows, FreeBASIC is very close to QuickBASIC already. And
386+ PCs
>-Original Message-
>From: Roberto Mariottini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:37 AM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] 32 bit
>
>
>
>Imre Leber wrote:
>> Well I for one think that FreeDOS should move into the 32bit realm
Imre Leber wrote:
> Well I for one think that FreeDOS should move into the 32bit realm after
> version 1.
>
> All the 32bit stuff was written by the DJGPP project. But it didn't make any
> sense philosophicaly as long as it did not run on a free DOS operating system.
>
> Now that we did the t
I think, the DJGPP developers would be very happy if you would help them -
I think they could release a new version, but are to busy for that... ^^
bye
flo
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:57:47 +0200, Gregory Pietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> monstrosities such as OpenWatcom and gcc.
> The seco
Well I for one think that FreeDOS should move into the 32bit realm after
version 1.
All the 32bit stuff was written by the DJGPP project. But it didn't make any
sense philosophicaly as long as it did not run on a free DOS operating system.
Now that we did the time and have a free operating syst
N, it isn't a bad tone ;-)
bye
Flo
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:14:40 +0200, Alain M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sage is something
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
-
Using Tomcat bu
I wrote to the author this summer ... it looked that he wanted to
continue with RXDOS, but I think he is too busy. It is a nice kernel too -
I think one of the bugs is a LFN bug when deleting a file...
A link at the kernel page would be good...
bye
Flo
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:10:33 +0200,
Ladislav Lacina wrote:
> I think we surely don't need a new C compiler. They were already mentioned
> some good existing ones. However the DOS world is missing modern 16-bit
> pascal compiler. We have Freepascal, TMT pascal, Virtual pascal but they all
> make 32-bit protected mode code. It wouldn'
Jim Hall wrote:
> did it wrong. I emailed the ibiblio torrent guys this morning, asking
> for help.
OK
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
Well I think what we are realy missing is a good BASIC compiler. Something like
QuickBASIC. Free BASIC has something like that but that works only in 32 bit.
Let's completely rewrite it so that it works in 16 bit real mode. Especially if
we can hold all the tables in XMS. So that it requires a 3
I think we surely don't need a new C compiler. They were already mentioned
some good existing ones. However the DOS world is missing modern 16-bit
pascal compiler. We have Freepascal, TMT pascal, Virtual pascal but they all
make 32-bit protected mode code. It wouldn't be bad to write a realmode
pas
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> Borland C is, also as OpenWatcom, doesn't run on less than 80386.
> But why you not complain about Borland C, but complain about more
> functional and portable OpenWatcom?
Turbo C++ is also Borland C, though stripped down, and prior to v3 did r
Hi,
This is not a bad idea in itself. But you are about 10 years too late.
In a very distant past FreeDOS had a project to build a free DOS compiler. But
it got forgotten when pacific c was released for free use.
For us who still remember him, you could contact Steffen Kaiser about this, he
Interested, tell us more.
Does it work in the direction of having a borland compatible C library for
openwatcom?
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From: Blair Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 05:26 AM
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re:
30 matches
Mail list logo
