dosfsck is 32-bit. Defrag could be too (especially a version which
supports FAT32).
On 9/16/06, Imre Leber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What doesn't stop to amaze me is that this project is so completely oposed
> to anything 32bit. But when it comes down to it you all complain that things
> don
Hello Imre,
> What doesn't stop to amaze me is that this project is so completely
> oposed to anything 32bit.
you can run any 32 Bit application on top of DOS; where's your problem ?
that defrag has problems with 35 GB disks is a defrag bug, totaly
independent on the bitness of DOS
> But when it
What doesn't stop to amaze me is that this project is so completely oposed to
anything 32bit. But when it comes down to it you all complain that things don't
work on GIGA disks which are so incredibely over spec of anything DOS was ever
designed to do.
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From:
Hi,
I like Ubuntu, but if I want to develope or to "play" with a computer, I
am using DOS. Else, I have to use WinXP, because of the drivers and of
compatiblity of some programs... ^^
bye
Flo
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:18:22 +0200, Lyrical Nanoha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep
Hi, I tested version 1.2.1 I geht the same error (FAT32, ~35GB). With
drivers and without ANY (even without XMS driver).
bye
Flo
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done q
No, this is not that easy. Just mind that in TP and FP a pointer is 4
bytes long. But in TP it is SEG:OFS, and in FP it is a 32-bit offset.
That is a big difference
Aitor
2006/9/16, Daniel Franzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> well...i'm not exactly an expert in the subject but i've noticed that
>
Freepascal generates only 32-bit code. Doesn't
matter whether writes directly machine opcodes (EXE file) or ASM code. It is
still 32-bit.
It would be difficult to add the compilation
platform "16-bit DOS" into Freepascal but it is not imposible. You would have to
write all standard units, fu
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Daniel Franzini wrote:
> well...i'm not exactly an expert in the subject but i've noticed that
> freepascal suports nasm output...and nasm can generate 16bit code...not sure
> if it is 286 real or protected mode code, altough it seems to be real mode
> (i've seen people writin
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Blair Campbell wrote:
> I personally much prefer Debian, which is free in every form, easy to
> install, and easy to use.
Yeah. Debian, or Ubuntu which is pretty much the same thing.
-uso.
-
Using Tomc
