Ok, I was thinking more along the lines of a file that combines all the
fixes, hence the version scheme...
CHKDSK fix, kernel update, couple of other changes...all wrapped up into one
file...download and install...now FreeDOS 1.0 is patched up to 1.0.1 (or
1.1)
The newest CD automatically
E! I'd rather not go back to "beta9 SP2" etc naming scheme. The
next FreeDOS should _not_ be a "FreeDOS 1.0 SP1". The next FreeDOS is
indeed an incremental improvement with no major changes (i.e. updated
packages, etc) then "FreeDOS 1.1" would be acceptable. A larger jump in
functionali
