Well, several versions actually. There are many features found from
versions 3 to 7.
On 10/30/06, Lyrical Nanoha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, TG wrote:
>
> > I have a (silly) question. A brand new installation of FreeDOS 1.0 is
> > supposed to emulate what version of MS-DOS?
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, TG wrote:
> I have a (silly) question. A brand new installation of FreeDOS 1.0 is
> supposed to emulate what version of MS-DOS?
As far as I know, 3.31.
> Right now, my base install of FreeDOS 1.0 reminds me of a cross between
> MS-DOS 3.3 and MS-DOS 5.0. I know there will pr
I have a bug for 2036 and 2037: SUBST never works properly (and the
problems associated seem to be different wherever I test them).
On 10/30/06, Alain M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had this conversation with Eric:
>
> Alain>> Do you know a list of bugs/limitations of 2036?
> Eric> if you find
I had this conversation with Eric:
Alain>> Do you know a list of bugs/limitations of 2036?
Eric> if you find some, let me know, then i can look in
2037 for the corresponding bugfixes. [...]
Does anyone have a list of 2036 bugs?
Alain
> Right now, my base install of FreeDOS 1.0 reminds me of a cross between
> MS-DOS 3.3 and MS-DOS 5.0. I know there will probably be no equivalent to
> MS-DOS Shell (courtesy of the Central Point Software UI) especially since
> GEM is widely available.
Or oZone ;-))
Bye
Flo
--
Florian Xaver
W
Guys,
I fixed the problem with the FreeDOS Bugzilla where you were forced to
constantly login to make any updates. Silly me, when we moved the
www.freedos.org site to freedos.sourceforge.net, I also changed the
Bugzilla entry page (http://www.freedos.org/freedos/bugs/) to use
http://www.freed
Right now I uplodaed a new version of Bloček -
v.1.0.3
There are fixed few small bugs and added vertical
scrollbar. Now I want to focus to word wrapping :-)
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
In fact FreeDOS has *many* MS-DOS 7.10 features :) FAT32 today is one
that is very important, LFN too...
Alain
TG escreveu:
> I have a (silly) question. A brand new installation of FreeDOS 1.0 is
> supposed to emulate what version of MS-DOS?
---
Eric Auer escreveu:
> Agreed. Once we reach 1.9 we should just call the next version
> the 2.0 one :-). Please have a look at
IMHO after 1.9 comes 1.10.
I also don't like jumps in version numbers like Firefox did. It makes
people very confused. I have seen it in Mozilla's user list.
And, I thi
Hi Eric,
IIRC 2037 fixed somthing in LFN, I vote for that in a new version.
Has Blair givven you info about 2037 changes?
Alain
Eric Auer escreveu:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> E! I'd rather not go back to "beta9 SP2" etc naming scheme...
>
> Right. I have a related question: Tom gave me a copy of hi
I have a (silly) question. A brand new installation of FreeDOS 1.0 is
supposed to emulate what version of MS-DOS?
The reason I ask this is because while comparing FreeDOS 1.0 and MS-DOS 6.22
side by side, I started looking for features and other system utilities. I
found that COMPINFO is the eq
Hi Jim,
> E! I'd rather not go back to "beta9 SP2" etc naming scheme...
Right. I have a related question: Tom gave me a copy of his
2035-Tom kernel sources, and I included a 2037-findfirst fix
in the 2036 kernel. I might find some more useful fixes in
2035-Tom and 2037, and then I guess "20
12 matches
Mail list logo
