Blair Campbell schreef:
> He meant the OpenWatcom package that is supplied with FreeDOS 1.0, but
> I don't know what that has to do with config.bat
>
What I mean is that the kernel sources (if installed by FreeDOS 1.0.0)
use a file named config.bat to indicate compiler settings.
Also, FreeDOS 1
On 11/2/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2-Ноя-2006 19:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
> freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> BB> Also I'm curious if installing OpenWatcom from FreeDOS 1.0 configures
> BB> the config.bat,
>
> OW doesn't presents DOS i
> EA> That is a pity. Did Blair comment about the FreeCOM patches? Did
>
> Ask Blair yourself, for me he is too rare answers.
Some of us work 12 hours/day.
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
David Letterman (1947 - )
Se
Hi!
2-Ноя-2006 19:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BB> Also I'm curious if installing OpenWatcom from FreeDOS 1.0 configures
BB> the config.bat,
OW doesn't presents DOS installer. If you wrote own installer, you may
update there anything.
BB
Hi!
2-Ноя-2006 15:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
JH> Using 2-digit subversions ("1.01") looks too similar to "1.0.1" kind of
JH> naming.
Yes. And for me, second looks more sensible, because allows explicitly
differ intermediate releases (1.0 ==
Yes, "1.3.2" makes perfect sense, I think. First, "1.3" indicates the
third minor release after "1.0". Now let's say there was a really bad
bug discovered in FreeCOM 0.99B in that distro, found just after going
live with "1.3", so we'd make a bug-fix distro right away as "1.3.1"
that included
It looks good, but I just wonder how to name the second bug-fix
release after the third release after FreeDOS 1.0, in that case you
are forced to something like 1.3.2...
Aitor
2006/11/2, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Using 2-digit subversions ("1.01") looks too similar to "1.0.1" kind of
> nami
Using 2-digit subversions ("1.01") looks too similar to "1.0.1" kind of
naming. I'd rather we reserve those numbers for bug-fix releases that
don't add any new functionality.
For standard distributions, I prefer we use the simpler 1-digit
subversions. In my mind, if we make 9 small updates af
Hi,
2006/10/30, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> > E! I'd rather not go back to "beta9 SP2" etc naming scheme...
>
> Right. I have a related question: Tom gave me a copy of his
> 2035-Tom kernel sources, and I included a 2037-findfirst fix
> in the 2036 kernel. I might find some
May I suggest two decimal cyphers? (1.01, 1.02, 1.03... 1.99)
9 small updates to FreeDOS 1.0 may not make FreeDOS 2.0.
Aitor
2006/10/29, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> E! I'd rather not go back to "beta9 SP2" etc naming scheme. The
> next FreeDOS should _not_ be a "FreeDOS 1.0 SP1". The n
2006/11/1, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Questions are:
> - what is the roadmap for FreeDOS 1.1 release?
Call on me... wanted to consolidate some documents here and there. On
the way ;-)
Aitor
-
Using Tomcat but need to d
Arkady V.Belousov schreef:
> EA> But no valid install targets.
>
> This is another question.
>
FreeCOM does allow COPY NUL C:\TEST.TXT resulting in a 0 byte file.
Can't help it if MS COMMAND.COM doesn't allow it,
we're using FreeCOM anyway for installation purposes due to its added
functi
Hi!
2-Ноя-2006 18:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to "Arkady
V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> EA> cdrom drives have drive letters and are non-FAT, plus
>> But then they anyway "formatted". :)
EA> But no valid install targets.
This is another question.
Hi!
2-Ноя-2006 15:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to "Arkady
V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> No! There should be present somewhere stable, no-more-changed edition,
>> which should used as "absolute point". I think, with releasing FreeDOS 1.0,
>> which uses 2036, 2036 should be froz
Hi!
2-Ноя-2006 15:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to "Arkady
V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> You can't write on non-FAT partitions, because such partitions
>> don't get drive letter.
EA> cdrom drives have drive letters and are non-FAT, plus
But then they anyway "formatted". :)
Hi!
2-Ноя-2006 15:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to "Arkady
V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/~eric/stuff/soft/by-others/kernel2036-binary.zip
>> http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/~eric/stuff/soft/by-others/kernel2036-source.zip
EA> Correct - when I update
Hi!
11-Окт-2006 12:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> %comspec% /f /c copy nul c:\test.txt
EA> This is probably because the FIRST shell does the redirection and
EA> the second shell only does ECHO YES! Good point. And of course it
EA> would be very g
Hi!
11-Окт-2006 02:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BB> * SETUP.BAT batchfile, line 99, which tests if a file can be created on
BB> C:\ , kinda needs a change. It relies on redirection and on
BB> the /F parameter of the SHELL LINE in a config.sys
Hi!
2-Ноя-2006 12:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> This is what stops me currently from dealing with kernel, because there
>> is no management centralization. Eric, do you support/control your kernel
>> edition? What about Kenneth' edition? Who con
Hi Arkady, Bart,
> This is what stops me currently from dealing with kernel, because there
> is no management centralization. Eric, do you support/control your kernel
> edition? What about Kenneth' edition? Who control and support CVS?
You can assume that I am the only maintainer of kernel 2036,
Hi!
1-Ноя-2006 04:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>>> Looks like this change wasn't tested.
>> It looks like Eric has magic powers to produce .zip files anyway!
EA> actually i do not use makefiles or batchfiles to create zip files.
EA> but i hav
21 matches
Mail list logo
