On 11/3/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 3-Ноя-2006 10:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
> freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> >> Looks like this program is only for handling local CVS databases?
> RR> Yes. How about porting a newer CVS version to DJGPP
On 11/2/06, Bernd Blaauw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blair Campbell schreef:
> > He meant the OpenWatcom package that is supplied with FreeDOS 1.0, but
> > I don't know what that has to do with config.bat
> >
> What I mean is that the kernel sources (if installed by FreeDOS 1.0.0)
> use a file nam
At that rate, FreeDOS will be at 9.0 in a matter of months over things that
really amount to a .01 moniker...but hey I aint the boss, just a player in
the game...
For example, Imre just fixed a bug in CHKDSK and the kernel syncs (including
findfirst/findnext) may get a 1.1, but any fixes after
I totally agree. At this stage, anything done to FreeDOS doesn't warrant a
2.0 moniker. I'm seeing a 1.01 in the immediate future due to the kernel,
and utility updates (CHKDSK, DEBUG, etc and so forth).
-T
- Original Message -
From: "Aitor Santamaría" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thu
I sent the following to Japheth about a week ago:
> Have you contacted Paul Vojta vojta/@/math.berkeley.edu about your
> improvements to DEBUG? Paul does respond to email (I emailed him
> about a week ago, about something else) and I would prefer that Paul
> be kept in the loop on changes to a
Hi!
3-Ноя-2006 15:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Does this mean, that 99B replaced by newer version (latest 99G) or there is
RR> Yes. see http://www.japheth.de/dwnload4.html
Oh, previous time when I open http://www.japheth.de/ , it of
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> Does this mean, that 99B replaced by newer version (latest 99G) or there is
Yes. see http://www.japheth.de/dwnload4.html
> something wrong?
No.
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
-
Hi!
29-Сен-2006 11:34 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
J> I made some changes to FD DEBUG.COM:
J> http://www.japheth.de/Download/DEBUG99B.ZIP
"
Multiple Choices
The document name you requested (/Download/DEBUG99B.ZIP) could not be found
on this server. Ho
Hi!
3-Ноя-2006 10:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Looks like this program is only for handling local CVS databases?
RR> Yes. How about porting a newer CVS version to DJGPP + WATTCP for TCP
RR> connections? ;-)
I myself have no experie
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> 1. To eliminate confusing (both human DD/MM-MM/DD and machine sorting,
>better place year before).
There is no "human confusion", because I wrote "MMM" (three "M"), e.g.,
"03-NOV-2006".
"Machine sorting" doesn't apply here, because I didn't talk about
filenames.
Hi!
3-Ноя-2006 10:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Using 2-digit subversions ("1.01") looks too similar to "1.0.1" kind of
>> naming. I'd rather we reserve those numbers for bug-fix releases that
>> don't add any new functionality.
RR> I dis
Jim Hall wrote:
> Using 2-digit subversions ("1.01") looks too similar to "1.0.1" kind of
> naming. I'd rather we reserve those numbers for bug-fix releases that
> don't add any new functionality.
I dislike such debates so much, that I use DD-MMM- for all my
projects. ;-)
Robert Riebisch
--
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> Looks like this program is only for handling local CVS databases?
Yes. How about porting a newer CVS version to DJGPP + WATTCP for TCP
connections? ;-) see http://www.nongnu.org/cvs/
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
Hi!
3-Ноя-2006 07:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> IIRC there is a CVS client for DOS, but I might have to find it.
BB> ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/current/v2gnu
BB> as stated on http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/showdoc.php?page=howto-cvs ?
14 matches
Mail list logo
