Hi Enrico,
>> [after] dos_cd ("C:\hello\world");
>> dos_open ("C:\hello\world\my_file.txt", O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0); [ok]
>> dos_open ("my_file.txt", O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0); [fails]
>
> As discussed earlier, dos_open is a bit "lowlevel" if you look
> at DosOpenSft, you will find that it calls truename
Hi Eric,
> The difference in the current implementation is that we now
> have a "cache" with two "near" fnodes in the kernel data
> segment. That way, fewer far pointers are needed, but
> several functions got more complicated. For example
> get_f_node. The other difference is that
> you use
