Re: [Freedos-devel] SUBST is working?

2007-06-17 Thread Alain M.
Hi Eric, > thanks for hunting the SUBST bug! Look at bugzilla, > it should be a known bug. Which bugzilla? I'd appreciate if you sent me a link ;-) > Something about the current > directory and/or root directory not being handled > correctly. There is something more... It allways works with a f

Re: [Freedos-devel] SUBST is working?

2007-06-17 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Alain, > > thanks for hunting the SUBST bug! Look at bugzilla, > > it should be a known bug. > Which bugzilla? I'd appreciate if you sent me a link ;-) www.freedos.org/bugzilla/cgi-bin/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__ www.freedos.org/bugzilla/cgi-bin/show_bug.cgi?id=1862 > Let me explain: som

Re: [Freedos-devel] SUBST is working?

2007-06-17 Thread Alain M.
Hi, >>> thanks for hunting the SUBST bug! Look at bugzilla, >>> it should be a known bug. >> Which bugzilla? I'd appreciate if you sent me a link ;-) > www.freedos.org/bugzilla/cgi-bin/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__ Thanks, I saved that > www.freedos.org/bugzilla/cgi-bin/show_bug.cgi?id=1862 D

Re: [Freedos-devel] SUBST is working?

2007-06-17 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Alain, > I am not sure which version I have, it is the one I translated an then > lost the sources (when I was robbed). I will test with a later one. > Where should I get the latest (binary) from? I still suggest to extract the translation from your binary... Kernel and FreeCOM command.com d

Re: [Freedos-devel] SUBST is working?

2007-06-17 Thread Bart Oldeman
On 6/17/07, Alain M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure which version I have, it is the one I translated an then > lost the sources (when I was robbed). I will test with a later one. > Where should I get the latest (binary) from? A compiled SVN rev 1337 is here now (FAT32/WATCOMC/8086):