Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS directory standard (1.1?)

Hi! 6-Янв-2008 12:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: >> >> How this should look nice at same length: >> >> BIN >> >> DOC >> >> HLP (or INF, or MAN) >> >> SRC >> >> LIB >> >> INC JH> Aside from everything being 3-characters so it lines up nicely in a

Re: [Freedos-devel] New Mouse Driver Development...

Hi! 6-Янв-2008 11:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: JH> I must admit that I'm confused about who is the maintainer of JH> Cutemouse these days, and what is the latest official version. Can JH> someone clear this up for me? Maintainer (was) Daniel

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS directory standard (1.1?)

On 1/5/08, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How this should look nice at same length: > > BIN > DOC > HLP (or INF, or MAN) > SRC > LIB > INC > > :) Aside from everything being 3-characters so it lines up nicely in a DIR listing, what value does it add to make directories hard fo

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS directory standard (1.1?)

On 1/5/08, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > LIB for libraries. We never really defined a "lib" before because > > FreeDOS doesn't support the shared-library model... > > I would put those in BIN if dynamic and in SOURCE if used to compile I don't think under BIN if dynamic is a g

Re: [Freedos-devel] New Mouse Driver Development...

I must admit that I'm confused about who is the maintainer of Cutemouse these days, and what is the latest official version. Can someone clear this up for me? Is Cutemouse 2.1 the latest official version? Or is 2.1 Eric's own fork of the project? The Cutemouse web site