Re: [Freedos-devel] Do not use any code from ms-dos release!

2014-04-23 Thread Charles Belhumeur
Well hopefully the multi-cores are true multi-taskers and you're getting the time savings you thing you are. You are definitely wasting time with the swapping function on single core CPUs. Its faster in single cores to just complete one task at a time, let a routines finish before starting another

Re: [Freedos-devel] Weird behaviour of "legacy USB" trackball

2014-04-23 Thread Charles Belhumeur
As far as I know mice are polled and not interrupt driven on Intel boxes. Its always been a performance turkey for the boxes. When mice first became popular many Intel boxes only had 8 hardware interrupts, XTs. ATs 286 got an additional 8 but one of the first 8 had to be used to chain to the sec

Re: [Freedos-devel] Do not use any code from ms-dos release!

2014-04-23 Thread Charles Belhumeur
Experience has given me a preference for low-level machine compilable languages Assembler and like the various flavors of C. I don't like languages like JAVA that ride a non-machine specific protocol and ride atop emulators or interpreters on top a browser on top an OS on top sophisticated hardwar

Re: [Freedos-devel] Do not use any code from ms-dos release!

2014-04-23 Thread Chris Evans
Its the startup bios that supports boot mode. once they move from legacy to UEFI your older mbr drives will not boot. --- I'd guess that, even with UEFI replacing legacy BIOS, bootable USB sticks with MBR partitioning will still be bootable, subject to the underlyimg OS being otherwise compatible

Re: [Freedos-devel] Do not use any code from ms-dos release!

2014-04-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
Excerpt from Rugxulo: > DOS on modern IBM PC clones have too many hardware compatibility > issues: power management, lack of networking (almost no packet > drivers), no soundcard drivers (or even static libs), almost no USB > support. It doesn't look like most hardware companies care enough to >