from Rugxulo:
> DJGPP has no "Windows version". It's a pure DOS compiler only. There
> is no Windows support. None is in the works. None was ever made. (I'm
> aware of very very small and obscure and incomplete hacks like RSXNT,
> but those don't count. Or at least haven't counted, even unofficial
Hi again,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Jim Michaels wrote:
>>
>> I got too excited and posted a message. I dug further into the readmes and
>> found out there is a commercial version of VMiX. there is no web site that I
>> could find. the
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Jim Michaels wrote:
>
> I got too excited and posted a message. I dug further into the readmes and
> found out there is a commercial version of VMiX. there is no web site that I
> could find. the project seems to get updated about once every 5-10 years.
Prob
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Jim Michaels wrote:
>
> seg:ofs=(seg*16)+ofs=(seg<<4)+ofs (note that it is not bit or, it is
> addition). translation of such an address is
> I think requires some macros or functions in DJGPP C/C++ compiler which uses
> protected mode (or other
> dos extend
Hi Andy,
> I'm just getting started programming for DOS but have worked a bit with
> different printing languages and would love to get started on a project
> that converts ESC/P to something more modern like PCL or PS on the fly. I
> will definitely need help on the TSR side as I know what they
> Re: FreeDOS vs. DOS-like operating systems
> There are plenty of DOS-like hobby projects out there. But without
> applications, they are pretty limited.
if by 'DOS-like' you mean 'small footprint, may access hardware,
possibly quite limited' there are plenty (toy-) operating systems out
there
