Works for but FTP has been slow.
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014, "Jose Antonio Senna" <
jasse...@vivointernetdiscada.com.br> wrote:
> Did anyone in this list check
> the link to www.sysdev.org ?
> I tried to connect to it and
> always got a timeout.
> JAS
>
>
> --
Did anyone in this list check
the link to www.sysdev.org ?
I tried to connect to it and
always got a timeout.
JAS
--
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Travis Siegel wrote:
> There's the krin tcp packet drivers, which seem to have drivers for
> just about any kind of card you'd like to support (since most that
> aren't supported can emulate one of those that is)
You mean Crynwr?
> So, there's all kinds of ways to handle net
As far as dos networking goes, there's several network apis/programs
that can be used. ka9q is an excellent example of what dos can do,
and it works on nearly anything. (I had it running on an xt at one
point, and it handled multiple users just fine).
There's the krin tcp packet drivers, whi
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi :-)
>
>> In my opinion historical applications should be advantage for intel devices
>> not weight for free dos. If NORTON COMMANDER is the condition lets to
>> rewrite it to c :-)
>
> There already are a few nice free file managers,
> including clones
Hi :-)
> In my opinion historical applications should be advantage for intel devices
> not weight for free dos. If NORTON COMMANDER is the condition lets to
> rewrite it to c :-)
There already are a few nice free file managers,
including clones of popular NC and XTree styles,
so that would be ea
>> it's not terribly difficult either. however nobody will program this
>> either :<
> My understanding was that the OP was willing to do some work in this area :)
if OP is 'original poster', then note that this long mail ends with
'well, that's enough food for thought for whoever is getting sta
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> You should definitely stick to as standard Ansi C as possible, so your
> project would compile
> on pretty much anything. I know some (most?) people here use OpenWatcom,
> since it's free.
> Myself I use rather Turbo C (when doing s
Hello,
In my opinion historical applications should be advantage for intel devices
not weight for free dos. If NORTON COMMANDER is the condition lets to
rewrite it to c :-)
There are new platforms like raspberry with ARM processor and others. Why
not to port free dos also to them? Free dos woul
