Hey,
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Chelson Aitcheson
> wrote:
>
> Nothing is impossible if it was the case we would all still be using reel to
> reel and tape decks lol.
>
> Lots of ideas and spit balling here but hey why not write it up and if people
> wana contribute then they will if not
Eric,
>
> That mainly is because Apple is Apple ;-) In DOS, you get very
> far with a standard C library, good old OpenWatcom or DJGPP, in
> the latter case even similar enough to the Linux GCC and G++ C
> and C++ infrastructure to ease porting of things to DOS. As DOS
> does not provide GUI, net
Nothing is impossible if it was the case we would all still be using reel
to reel and tape decks lol.
Lots of ideas and spit balling here but hey why not write it up and if
people wana contribute then they will if not keep using old trusty xt
On 06/06/2015 8:39 am, "Steve Nickolas" wrote:
> On S
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Chelson Aitcheson wrote:
> Doesn't matter, Mac os power pc applications dont work on new Mac os but
> it's still the same os.
> (rosetta comparability layer aside)
>
> I see this as more of a chance for a new generation of dos. Freedos 1.x has
> accomplished the needs for the e
Low end *nix apps could be ported in place of over dos apps hell we could
just make a Linux distro and slap a freedos sticker on it lol.
Problem is there are two arguments here.. why and why not.
If you build it they will come. If you don't then be happy carrying your
xt's on your back.
On 06/06/
Doesn't matter, Mac os power pc applications dont work on new Mac os but
it's still the same os.
(rosetta comparability layer aside)
I see this as more of a chance for a new generation of dos. Freedos 1.x has
accomplished the needs for the existing replacement or clone requirements
of a dos with e
Hi!
> A port of DOS to ARM would not be bound to any existing API and would not
> need to be compatible with any existing DOS implementations, while still
> being a port of DOS.
Well we already HAD a port to another CPU in the early times of
FreeDOS: After all, it acts a bit like a library wit
A port of DOS to ARM would not be bound to any existing API and would not
need to be compatible with any existing DOS implementations, while still
being a port of DOS.
-uso.
--
__
I agree, a 32-bit kernel would open up worlds of possibilities for the DOS
platform.
Also, just to clarify, I wasn't asking anyone's permission, just probing to
see what kind of interest there is out there.
I used to follow DOSCore and Aura closely back in the day when I was
working (off and on,
To see it on the arm architecture I think would be a good long term goal
for a 32 bit kernel.
Raspberry pi and other small arm boards are cheap and affordable and would
breathe life into the dos platform.
You don't need the freedos community approval or help as such for a
project. Just do it.
It
I am considering starting a test project to determine the feasibility of
implementing a 32-bit FreeDOS kernel. If I decide to do so, who else is
interested in contributing?
Said contributors could assist in coding, help with testing, establish and
evolve standards for the project, create documenta
Perhaps.I know it booted to my harddrive two months ago.Why wouldn't it
work now?Hm.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > I've tried everything.I ran format /s,I ran Fdisk,I've made the harddrive
> > bootable.But when I go to boot into the harddrive,my laptop just
> re
Hi!
> I've tried everything.I ran format /s,I ran Fdisk,I've made the harddrive
> bootable.But when I go to boot into the harddrive,my laptop just restarts.
There are various pretty technical reasons that could cause this:
BIOS and DOS disagreeing about geometry when you run SYS or FORMAT
versus
I've tried everything.I ran format /s,I ran Fdisk,I've made the harddrive
bootable.But when I go to boot into the harddrive,my laptop just restarts.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:56 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
> wrote:
> >
> > My main problem,Ruglu
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:56 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
wrote:
>
> My main problem,Rugluxio,was that it wont boot my harddrive after I run the
> format /s command on it.My harddrive doesn't seem to like booting.Which is
> funny,because I had it working perfectly 2 months ago.(I installed linux on
15 matches
Mail list logo
