Hi,
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 6:10 PM, Steve Nickolas wrote:
>
> A port of DOS to ARM would not be bound to any existing API and would not
> need to be compatible with any existing DOS implementations, while still
> being a port of DOS.
>
That’s technically incorrect. The reason that Linux (and U
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Steve Nickolas wrote:
>>
>> A port of DOS to ARM would not be bound to any existing API and would not
>> need to be compatible with any existing DOS implementations, while still
>> being a port of DOS.
>
> I know this mi
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Steve Nickolas wrote:
>
> A port of DOS to ARM would not be bound to any existing API and would not
> need to be compatible with any existing DOS implementations, while still
> being a port of DOS.
I know this might be stating the obvious, but you don't need a
