Hi,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> It might be worth looking at possible "pending" patches - there are some
> waiting in line, but sadly never applied nor revised.
>
> The one example I immediately think of (because it's mine) is this one
> about CGA support:
> http://s
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr.
wrote:
>
> Well, I was messing around a little with the new FreePascal Compiler for DOS.
>
> Basically, what ships requires DOS LFN support. Many units, libraries and
> executables
> are longer than the 8.3 standard file names.
>
> It wo
On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:14 PM, Tom Ehlert wrote:
>> Well, I was messing around a little with the new FreePascal Compiler for DOS.
>
>> Basically, what ships requires DOS LFN support. Many units, libraries and
>> executables
>> are longer than the 8.3 standard file names.
>
>> It would be a lot
Hello again,
I just made some changes to V8Power Tools so the user can remove the install
media before FDI does a system reboot.
So, I would like to get the following translated into all the appropriate
languages. (ES, EO, FR, NL & DE)
Once again, rewording is fine.
Remove the installation med
On your btw:
I like that too. Butthe advantage of developing on DOS itself is that you can
start made programs almost instantly. Because you have the right system for it.
You don't have to make a .img first before you can put it in a virtual machine.
I like the modern computer. I feel a bit 'ja
> Well, I was messing around a little with the new FreePascal Compiler for DOS.
> Basically, what ships requires DOS LFN support. Many units, libraries and
> executables
> are longer than the 8.3 standard file names.
> It would be a lot of tedious work to migrate it to completely support 8.3
>
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>
> Well, I was messing around a little with the new FreePascal Compiler for DOS.
>
> Basically, what ships requires DOS LFN support. Many units, libraries and
> executables
> are longer than the 8.3 standard file names.
>
> It woul
Well, I was messing around a little with the new FreePascal Compiler for DOS.
Basically, what ships requires DOS LFN support. Many units, libraries and
executables
are longer than the 8.3 standard file names.
It would be a lot of tedious work to migrate it to completely support 8.3
names.
I
It might be worth looking at possible "pending" patches - there are some
waiting in line, but sadly never applied nor revised.
The one example I immediately think of (because it's mine) is this one
about CGA support:
http://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/bugs/131/
Mateusz
On 12/01/2016 19:36, To
