Re: [Freedos-devel] Announcing FDOSTUI

2017-02-02 Thread Mark Olesen
INI has my upvote. Just not sure of how much scope I would include. what if you want a class that can be used to read and write to it (maintaining comments and such)? Complexity is added. I can see code creep. If it was read only it would be fairly simple and inexpensive. However, then other code

Re: [Freedos-devel] Announcing FDOSTUI

2017-02-02 Thread Jerome Shidel
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Mark Olesen wrote: > > Skinning at the moment can only be done by modifying code (skin.c). I left it > out because I do not know the best method of providing a decent configuration > file without adding allot of code bloat. FLTK has a preferences widget > (Fl_Pr

Re: [Freedos-devel] Announcing FDOSTUI

2017-02-02 Thread Mark Olesen
Skinning at the moment can only be done by modifying code (skin.c). I left it out because I do not know the best method of providing a decent configuration file without adding allot of code bloat. FLTK has a preferences widget (Fl_Preferences), which is a candidate. XML, JSON formats are other thin

Re: [Freedos-devel] Announcing FDOSTUI

2017-02-02 Thread Alain Mouette
I like that :) Just one question: can default collors be configured? I would like something like "dialog" in Linux which has a gray background... :) Alain On 01-02-2017 21:49, Mark Olesen wrote: Hello, I liked and made the changes you had pointed out. Thanks for the input. html pages affe